The charts below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart gives information about how much money earned from exporing in several items in a country in the two years (2015 and 2016) and units were measured in billon dollars. The table chart illustrates the percentage change in values of each product of exports in 2016, compared with 2015.
Overall, almost the items in 2016 had the highest amount of money than that in 2015 except engineered products. Simultaneously, the categories related to textiles had the highest percentage of increase from 2015 to 2016.
First of all, there was about 72 billion dollars which was gained from exporting petroleum products in 2016, this figure was higher than that in 2015 (around 61 billion dollars). Meanwhile, the amount of money earned in 2016 still was higher than that in 2015 in exporting engineered goods with around 61 billowing dollars and nearly 58 billon dollars respectively. In contrast, there was a distinctive difference from two previous items that the number of money earned in 2015 was higher than that in 2016 in exporting gems and jewellery with almost 42 billion dollars and nearly 41 dollars. In addition, the amount of money earned in both 2015 and 2016 year had about the same figure with around 31 billion dollars in agricultural products. Moreover, around 26 billion dollars and almost 31 billion dollars were the number of money earned in exporting textiles goods in 2015 and 2016 year respec.
Secondly, the percentage change in almost categories tended to increase from 2015 to 2016 excluded gems and jewellery goods. Specially, textiles goods had the highest percentage change in 2016 compared to 2015 with 15.24 percent, while there was inly 0.81% increase belonged to agricultural products. The petroleum products and engineered goods had the increase percentage with 3% and 8.5% respectively. Finally, the percentage of gems and jewellery items decreased 5.18 percent in 2016 compared to 2015.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, still, well, while, in addition, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 965.302439024 166% => OK
No of words: 312.0 196.424390244 159% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15064102564 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61627804938 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.36858974359 0.547539520022 67% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 283.868780488 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.953100925 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.615384615 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319417216822 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162646486402 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102909928615 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242645721008 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813198839994 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.