The given maps compare past and presnt condition of Paradise Island

Essay topics:

The given maps compare past and presnt condition of Paradise Island.

The modernisation of Paradise Island upto current time is reveals through two maps.

A quick look at both the maps is quite enough to make it clear that the spectacular alteration are seen in present paradise island. However, rocks and beach are still at constant position.

In the past map of paradise island, sea was flowing surround the island. The top left and right end were covered with beach and rocks. Pier and boats were in the southwest part of the map just behind the scientific research station. Natural spring was in front of the trees that were planted from west to east.

In comparison, with past island, modern island is completely changed with latest amenities though it is still located between the sea. Pier is extended towards west side and boats are replaced with cruise ships.Two swimming pools are introduced one next to the top left beach and second instead of northwest trees. scientific research station is knocked down for the construction of hotel complex that is connected to open restaurant. Cafe, BBQ area and cycle path are some other newly added facilities.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (12 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
...nd, modern island is completely changed with latest amenities though it is still located be...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Two
...nd boats are replaced with cruise ships.Two swimming pools are introduced one next ...
^^^
Line 7, column 316, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Scientific
... and second instead of northwest trees. scientific research station is knocked down for th...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, so, still

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97826086957 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45681029471 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635869565217 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6344461488 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2727272727 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7272727273 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205531460627 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780526817185 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112152080425 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126338427923 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396108254845 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.