The graph below shows cinema attendance by age group in Great Britain

Essay topics:

The graph below shows cinema attendance by age group in Great Britain.

The line graph compares the percentage by age groups of people going to movie theater from 1984 to 2000.
Overall, it is evident that the cinema attendance by four age groups increased during the period. Young adults from 15-24 years old accounted the largest proportion of attendants while the over 35 year - old group accounted the smallest percentage.
In1984, the number of people from 15-24 years old going to cinema went up from 18% to 32% in 1990s. After some fluctuations, this figures reached the peak of nearly 60% in 1999 and then decreased. Having the similar trend, there were some fluctuations of the percentage of children from 7-14 years old going to the cinema before 1990s. Then this figures rose up and peaked at approximately 40% in 1999 and fell down from 1999 to 2000.
The cinema attendance of 25-35 years old group showed a gradual increase from 5% to 15% before 1994. In the next 5 - year period, this figures fluctuated and then increased to 30% in 2000. Most of the time, the percentage of 25-35 years old group was lower than that of children group. The proportion of people over 35 years old attending cinema grew steadily form nearly 0% to 15% during the period and always accounted for the smallest proportion.

Votes
Average: 9.3 (4 votes)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the cinema attendance by four age groups increased during the period. Young adult...
^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...going to cinema went up from 18% to 32% in 1990s. After some fluctuations, this figures ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the percentage of 25-35 years old group was lower than that of children group. T...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78139534884 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46515782897 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511627906977 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.4867986022 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.4545454545 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.36363636364 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186616847713 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898654906484 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087301637533 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138235841924 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608388176193 0.0819641961636 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.