some people believe that people who read books can develop more imagination and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV,do you agree or disagree?
The persistency purpose of reading books,unquestionably,consolidate pellucid data to burgeone horizons of aquaintances.However,it has been arrogated by a segment of masses that individuals engaged relentlessly in reading cajole to ameliorate tendency in visualisation along with marvellous execution of language barriers.I menifestly agree that fomentation of books leads to sail salutary era.
To embark with,the multitudinous virtous affirmations are utterly related with reliability of reading non fiction disparate books,first tenable etiology,the instillation of allegories helps to incline imagination ,since the engrave wordings broadens the mind by opens to introduce new possibilities and new espouses assists the learner experience and analyze the word through other lives.To unravel epitome, philosophy of psychiatrist reveals,that becoming engrossed in a novel enhances connectivity nexus in the brain,because of involvement intently on orientation creates pulchritude circumambient premises.As a result imaginative person can jistify cumber ramifications and may take plausible commands of decisions
In addendum ,the prosperity potential in books also recreate to maintain confect in language representation.The context of articles ,stories and conversation boosts the neurons to comprehend the meaning of particular certain language ,which they are unfamiliar.The utilisation of text endow repetition of vocabulary words hence,provide stability in fluency in a effective way .To expound paradigm ,majority of books launched by integrity of authoritativeness just to offer comprehension,grammer and vocabulary exercises to sustain ground adaptivity among nations
In synopsis,after expliciting aforementioned consensus agreement ,books is far flung better to provide reliability of manifestation in cognitive skills and to sow the seed of unknown language in brain
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ries helps to incline imagination since the engrave wordings broadens the mind by opens to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 709, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...may take plausible commands of decisions In addendum the prosperity potential in ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...words henceprovide stability in fluency in a effective way To expound paradigm majority of books l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ds henceprovide stability in fluency in a effective way To expound paradigm major...
^
Line 5, column 554, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... sustain ground adaptivity among nations In synopsisafter expliciting aforementio...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ow the seed of unknown language in brain
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, may, so, still, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 24.0651302605 12% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.448 5.12529762239 126% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.00199950025 2.80592935109 143% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.708 0.561755894193 126% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.60771543086 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 250.0 20.2975951904 1232% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1612.0 106.682146367 1511% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 250.0 20.7667163134 1204% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 60.0 7.06120827912 850% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118246714463 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118246714463 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0649464284713 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158647008332 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 133.9 13.0946893788 1023% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -224.57 50.2224549098 -447% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 106.7 11.3001002004 944% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 21.61 12.4159519038 174% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 23.68 8.58950901804 276% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 71.0 9.78957915832 725% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 102.0 10.1190380762 1008% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 24.0 10.7795591182 223% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.