Some people think young people should go to university to further their education while others think they should be encouraged to work as car mechanics or builders etc. to serve society. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The issue of development of young people, in this day and age, has triggered a new round of heated debate. Some people argue that young people should have further education, whereas others believe that having a career as a junior worker should be chosen by young. Personally, I totally agree with the former view.
Hardly can anyone deny the fact that further education provides more opportunities to the young in the future. In the first place, young people can learn professional knowledge systematically in university. For example, doctors should have professional knowledge to care patients and do surgery. Is there anyone will agree with having medicine giving by a doctor who do not have license? Of course, the answer is no. In the second place, corporations prefer their staff having higher education. It is the developed process of the society. A bachelor degree student will have more difficult to find a favorable job today if his or her competitor has a master degree.
Considerable though the advantages of having higher education are, there are still some negative views. On the one hand, works like car mechanics or builders will provide chance for young people to gain money in their early age. Nowadays, the cost of living has jumped steadily. Working in an early age will help the young more independent. On the other hand, the practical experience is the best teacher for young people. For example, builders will not build a fantastic building if he just knows the basic theoretical knowledge from textbooks. Not every problem you meet in the work will have answer in the book. What the textbook can give us are the introduction of professional knowledge and the basic method of solving problem, not the real answer in full detail.
In conclusion, gaining money is a vital pursuit in our lives, however having professional education will give us more bright future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 596, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'answered'.
Suggestion: answered
... problem you meet in the work will have answer in the book. What the textbook can give...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, still, whereas, for example, in conclusion, of course, in the first place, in the second place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03184713376 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67447671002 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576433121019 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5090129404 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200846574278 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562248948043 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651428748528 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1264134601 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697967395744 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.