In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build homes there.
What is your opinion about this?
In most parts, there is a high demand for building houses. However, due to the lack of space in the metropolitan area, construction should be carried out in rural areas. Some people assert it is imperative to preserve the countryside and preclude these parts from being residential. While I concur this notion has some merits, I do not think it is comprehensively true.
On the one hand, supporters of the aforementioned viewpoint enlist some facts to defend their perspective. They say If the construction of new houses is carried out in these parts, the ecosystem will be rendered deteriorated. To elaborate, firstly, to build houses in rural areas, some vegetation should be removed from premises. Not only this trend will change the scenery, but the animals that live there will also be forced to immigrate or evolve with the new situation. In either case, the ecosystem will be altered. Secondly, this development will cause air and soil contamination. These residential zones need infrastructures such as roads and sewage system, which will contaminate local soil and air. For example, statistics show that the level of pollution has risen 80 percent in newly urbanized zones compared to a few decades ago when these parts were rural.
On the other hand, it seems that stopping this development has more pivotal consequences. First and foremost, it leads to overpopulation of cities. Consequently, other challenges such as traffic congestion and water treatment problem will emerge. Moreover, as an alternative to urbanizing rural areas, other methods such as building vertical cities should be employed, which needs far more resources than the former. As a result, more jungles should be deforested and more mines should be dug, which is more harmful to the ecosystem than building houses in the countryside.
To recapitulate, on the basis of the mentioned explanations, although protecting the countryside is a noble cause, I am not convinced that stopping the construction of houses in these parts is more lucrative because not only further development in cities has the same negative effects, but also more consequential problems such as overpopulation will arise.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1836.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27586206897 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06993398125 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3473582753 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05555555556 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155087636855 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485109891413 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379856354766 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101586160825 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247190208572 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.