In modern society, people attach more importance to the leadership with the increasing demands of teamwork. Someone may believe that the talent of leadership is inborn, which ordinary people are by no means able to acquire. However, I firmly vote for the idea that leadership can be obtained through practicing.
As far as I can see, leadership is nothing but a special talent about leading other persons to reach a goal. It may involve various kinds of knowledge such as psychology, sociology and some others, causing leadership to look like too awesome to handle. On the contrary, mastering the gist of leadership is actually a piece of cake. Take my friend Jason for example. As a college student majoring in civil engineering, he was totally an introvert. None of his classmate regarded him of an inborn leader, let alone a proper candidate of their monitor. However, quite to their surprise, Jason was successfully elected to be the chairman of the Student Union on campus. What is more, the Student Union has been thriving since he took up the position of president. It turns out that Jason took a course related to the cultivation of leadership last year, and with the guidance and instruction of the professor, he started practicing the tricks learnt in class in the reality. Eventually, all his efforts paid off and he did make it to be a man with fabulous leadership. Therefore, it is safe to say that normal people are endowed with capability of excellent leadership and they certainly can get the handle of it as long as they stick to practicing.
Some people may argue that leadership are intimately related with some inborn personalities, which may be overwhelming obstacles on the way to grasping leadership. This opinion sounds plausible at the first glance, but we can readily discover the flaws in it after examination. Is it impossible to alter one’s personalities even if he is determined enough? Obviously, the answer is no. There is actually no such thing as constant. Actually, one’s personality is more or less dictated by the ambience and the false self-impression. Suppose a man used to be overweight and often laughed at by his peers. Thus he became in-going due to lack in confidence. You can imagine he may still bury himself into the thought of being obese, even if now he has lost weight and is not overweight anymore. But it is easy to get rid of this by changing his mindset. From what is said above, we can draw a conclusion that changing the personality is not a tough task.
To sum it up, raising the ability of leadership is practical for ordinary people. So we can learn to be a good leader.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 613, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ight and often laughed at by his peers. Thus he became in-going due to lack in confi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, still, therefore, thus, as to, for example, such as, more or less, on the contrary, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2196.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 455.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82637362637 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87848831236 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551648351648 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0055982575 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3333333333 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8518518519 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.40740740741 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144893961374 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379744963259 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348429185564 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995446138949 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0125052038418 0.0645574589148 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.