Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, there has been a drastic rise in the levels of environmental pollution due to unsustainable exploitation of nature for human benefit. While some argue that individuals can make a difference, others believe that only the government can effectively counter this problem. This essay will discuss both the sides and provide reasons why only the government can alleviate environmental concerns.
To begin with, one strong argument in favour of individuals driving the change is that ultimately, it is up to them to embrace lifestyle changes that inhibit the factors responsible for environmental pollution. For example, abolishing the use of plastics and choosing paper or cloth-based packaging material can eliminate a major source of soil pollution. Furthermore, preferring public transport over individual cars can lessen air pollution. Therefore, individual contributions can help reduce pollution to an extent.
However, only at the government level can real change on a global scale be brought. Not only are they the most competent authority, but also have adequate financial and material resources at their disposal to implement stringent laws for tackling this issue head-on. For instance, proper regulations can limit pollution caused by industries, which includes harmful industrial effluents and gases. Moreover, they can make it mandatory for citizens to adhere to environment-friendly policies that can curtail the extent of pollution.
To conclude, despite the contribution of each individual to manage environmental pollution, a significant reduction will occur only with the intervention of the government. In my opinion, nature-friendly citizens coupled with a strong government resolve will most definitely mitigate the factors causing environmental pollution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to paper'
Suggestion: to paper
...ishing the use of plastics and choosing paper or cloth-based packaging material can e...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 5.75862068966 399% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89312977099 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31542984452 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641221374046 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9769472274 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.769230769 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.25397266985 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193486392837 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767570602835 0.0925447433944 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784826248286 0.071462118173 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111513808743 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065649592821 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.