We can see more disasters and violence shown on TV.
What are its causes and what effects will they exert on the individual and the society?
It is undeniable media is significant for the entire community. What should telecast on TV is always a debatable topic? Some people believe media should not air too many crime-related episodes but others think they have full freedom to play whatever they like. In the following essay, I will examine the core reasons and propose solid solutions for them.
One of the main problems modern youth inclined towards crimes because TV episodes air full of crimes and crime-related theories. If people watch more hate they will have a tendency to do similar. For Instance, a recent burglary happens near my town, and when criminals caught they told to police they used an entire plot from a well-known TV serial. Thus, airing crimes on TV is catastrophic for society.
Another point these days TV episodes show a number of disaster-related news all the time. By doing they create a pessimistic feeling in the citizens. Watching disaster at a significant time is detrimental to the community. For example, 2017 floods in India created havoc there, and all Indian print and digital media was zooming those disturbing pictures and showing them at enlarging ratio. Therefore, it makes the situation dramatically horrifying.
These problems can be solved by a number of solution. Firstly, extreme hate or crime-related episodes should not be air on prime time because maximum viewers watch them on that time. Secondly, media should not create disaster stories hypersensitive or too much emotional as they create panic and frustration to the individuals. They should show realistic news with sympathy towards people and affected.
In conclusion, Airing crime-related TV serials are detrimental to our society and will pose a massive threat due to the reasons of too much hate and danger-related videos. Unless, media implement restrain on too much news about crimes it will be challenging. Personally, I Think prime responsibility lies with Media broadcasters.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-11 | emdy29 | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-19 | ndkndk01 | 69 | view |
| 2020-08-28 | Srbkor19sandhu | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Ankita7443 | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-07 | tubinh1998 | 91 | view |
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 8 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 312 350
No. of Characters: 1600 1500
No. of Different Words: 186 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.203 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.128 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.884 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 122 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 88 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 60 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.6 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.651 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.281 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.505 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.055 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...l of crimes and crime-related theories. If people watch more hate they will have a...
^^
Line 9, column 173, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Unless” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...oo much hate and danger-related videos. Unless, media implement restrain on too much n...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28205128205 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97068185613 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2089542266 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141099283282 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452949886755 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384527754139 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0803896513081 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224654677881 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.