Some people think that computers and the Internet are important in children's study, but others believe that students can learn more effectively in schools and with teachers. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
The social networking platform gained in popularity over the past decade. Therefore, inevitable that some people think that computers and the Internet are important in children's study. While no one can deny smart devices have facilitated many aspects of human life, some people believe that students can learn more effectively in schools and with teachers. I believe that it is difficult to only study through the Internet, but I can deny that internet brings many new things in education now.
First, computers and the Internet are important in children’s study, especially in the development and modern life. For example, students can find a lot of information and document easier. Second, students can connect with their friends and discuss their lessons together without going out of their houses. Computers and the internet help students connected with their friends and they can study together easier through video call apps, and then children have more interest in studying and the study results can be better. One reason everyone cares is that there is no cost of transportation.
On the other hand, as we can see the internet plays an important role in children’s study but it is difficult for them to distinguish right from wrong with much knowledge, many materials on the internet, and that is the reason why there is nothing better than study with teachers and peers in school. First, at school, we have a true study environment with the management of the teachers and the study spirit of the classmates. When studying at school, children can study and interact with their teachers who have a high level of qualification and education for their learning. Second, by studying at school with friends, children will have more motivation to get more good results. It can be said that studying is a very long journey, students can not always concentrate on their studies. When studying at school, the study spirit of classmates will motivate children to keep going, and children will have more motivation and energy to study better.
In conclusion, the internet plays a significant role in children’s study. However, I believe that it is hard to completely replace learning at school because of the importance of school, teachers, and classmates. Technology shows the development of society but the values of people are hard to replace, especially in education. One of the best ways is collapsing between technology and traditional approaches to make all the knowledge more qualified and easier for children to study.
- Some people think that computers and the Internet are important in children s study but others believe that students can learn more effectively in schools and with teachers Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Public museum and art galleries are not needed because people can see historical objects and artistic works via the Internet 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2202.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 424.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19339622642 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76905274045 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47641509434 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 657.0 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0156995923 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.1 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415376536134 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12940452268 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874503866367 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251170160932 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589400332899 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2202.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 424.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19339622642 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76905274045 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47641509434 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 657.0 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0156995923 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.1 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415376536134 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12940452268 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874503866367 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251170160932 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589400332899 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.