As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree?
It has been common for companies to put profits as a priority, but whether they need to have social responsibilities is becoming increasingly controversial. In my opinion, I completely agree with the idea that businesses should do more for the society while making money.
On the one hand, it is important for businesses to strive for maximizing their profits. Only by making exceeding money can they be able to continually run the working system. When the enterprises’ system is financially stable, they are more prone to actively contribute to society. Moreover, the more money a business makes, the more taxes it pays for the government. This process will induce better public service for the country as the government has more capitals to improve key fields. For example, countries in Europe, having large budgets from tax revenues, all provide fee-free schools and do not charge people when going to hospitals while the facilities are highly-advanced.
On the other hand, there are convincing reasons why companies should be responsible for society. One of the reasons is that business activities have a direct impact on the environment. The destruction of natural resources can bring about disastrous consequences, which create industrial wastes, factory emissions, and most of all, pollution. Therefore, not only do they care about the revenues but they also have to implement environmental policies and install waste treatment systems in every project. Another reason is that since the profits they gain are from people, they should reciprocate those in vulnerable groups. Businesses can use a portion of the profits to give charity donations or provide scholarships for poor students.
In conclusion, I believe both the pursuit of gaining profits and the responsibility in developing the society are two inextricable elements that all corporations should have no matter what field they are in.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... having large budgets from tax revenues, all provide fee-free schools and do not ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39333333333 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05140404841 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613333333333 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.385529681 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.866666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204636114208 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680438930059 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604735147157 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135954439302 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761799714632 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.