The author claims that as per the recent reports from their marketing department, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year so he concludes that in order to increase public he should allocate greater share next year to advertising. He bases his reasoning on the ground that there is no problem with the quality of movies rather their is lack of awarness of movies. The author's idea is unlikely to be successful as their are several flaws in the reasoning and incomplete evidence that can be seen from the below reasons.
Firstly, the author assumes that the report generated from the marketing department for the past year says that fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies. There might be the case that the marketing department has not taken into account all the public and their survey has considered only the urban public that gives the review online. It is not always the case that all the audience gives the review on the movies resulting in fewer people attendance to their movies. Also, author fails to clarify the statistical data of the people attending the movies. The percentage of positive reviews that are high might be the result of the fewer people only giving reviews and that to positive one. The author has not taken into account other people that might has disliked the movie causing the positive reviews of the movies to increse.
Secondly, the author claims that their is no problem in the quality of their movies. This statement is a strech as their is no evidence of these kind of movies been liked by a wider range of audience and is has received ratings from the Censor board of the flim production. Also, the audience to which this production Company is targeting doesn't like Super Screen-produced movies but something other than this. The author fails to take into account hte choices of the audience and is also showing one kind of movie, resulting in low attendance from the audience. Instead he thinks that allocating a greater budget to the advertising can solve their problem hich might furthur worsen the situation and in coming year leads to a huge loss that is difficult to idemnify leading to shutdown of the company.
Though there are several keyloop holes in the author's argument at present, with research and clarification, he can improve his argument significantly. For instance, the author should have taken into account the kind of the movies their audience prefer. This would have helped them in good attendance. Also, he should have provide the statistical data as to how much amount of the audience provided the positive review, making his movie quality argument acceptable. Should have mentioned the review survey more statistically.
In a nutshell, as we can see from above mentioned reasons and examples, we can conclude that the author's stance is prone to acute reasoning and hence open to debate.
- Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate. 66
- Recently, there have been discussions about ending Grove College's century-old tradition of all-female education by admitting male students into our programs. At a recent faculty meeting, a majority of faculty members voted in favor of coeducation, arguin 58
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 83
- Pirouettes Ballet School is the clear choice for any child. Of all the dance schools in Elmtown, Pirouettes has the most intensive program, and our teachers have danced in the most prestigious ballet companies all over the world. Many of our students have 58
- "According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies ac 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...oblem with the quality of movies rather their is lack of awarness of movies. The auth...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 402, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...heir is lack of awarness of movies. The authors idea is unlikely to be successful as th...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 447, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...rs idea is unlikely to be successful as their are several flaws in the reasoning and ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...se. Secondly, the author claims that their is no problem in the quality of their m...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...r movies. This statement is a strech as their is no evidence of these kind of movies ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... is a strech as their is no evidence of these kind of movies been liked by a wider range o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ch this production Company is targeting doesnt like Super Screen-produced movies but s...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 564, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...ng in low attendance from the audience. Instead he thinks that allocating a greater bud...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 776, Rule ID: GOT_SHUTDOWN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to shut down'?
Suggestion: to shut down
...s that is difficult to idemnify leading to shutdown of the company. Though there are se...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 47, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... there are several keyloop holes in the authors argument at present, with research and ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 323, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
...n good attendance. Also, he should have provide the statistical data as to how much amo...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 98, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... and examples, we can conclude that the authors stance is prone to acute reasoning and ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 13.6137724551 125% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 28.8173652695 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 55.5748502994 115% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 16.3942115768 146% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2418.0 2260.96107784 107% => OK
No of words: 485.0 441.139720559 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98556701031 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57974319037 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 204.123752495 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.430927835052 0.468620217663 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 752.4 705.55239521 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7724588947 57.8364921388 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.9 119.503703932 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 23.324526521 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.70786347227 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.25449101796 228% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307483444436 0.218282227539 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100435395752 0.0743258471296 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108557298551 0.0701772020484 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16234102696 0.128457276422 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123146620225 0.0628817314937 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.5979740519 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 98.500998004 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.