"According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the past year. Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising."
The argument assumes that a huge budget in advertising about the Super Screen Movie Production Company will attract the more viewers but even a cursory reader can understand that it has some incongruity with its reasons. It neglects some crucial facts to be dealt with such as people's economic conditions, cost of ticket etc.
To start with, the argument doesn't consider the economic background of people. It can be possible that the cost of ticket fixed by the production company is high and most of the residents may not have a stable financial support. Thus watching movies seems to be an extravagance to them. Thus the company has to reconsider about the price of the ticket.
Again, argument does not take into account the sale of DVD of the movies. Perhaps, many people find it for convenient to buy DVD and watch the movie in his leisure time in home. Modern technology has advanced so much that one can even view movie from internet. In that case, only investing more budgets in advertising doesn't affect the number of viewers in movie hall.
Lastly, argument only infers about the quality of movies on the basis of movie reviewers' positive responses but never analyses the demand of common people. It also doesn't state the popularity of other production house. It may be the case that these companies are releasing movies of better qualities.
In conclusion, the reasons described in the argument does little to bolster the conclusion about the investing more budgets in advertising to motivate more people to come to hall. Thus the argument has to look into other influential factors mentioned above and after proper investigation on these one can conclude whether more investment can attract more viewers.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-07 | Venkateshwar | 50 | view |
2019-11-25 | Venkateshwar | 23 | view |
2019-11-25 | Smrithi B R | 33 | view |
2019-11-09 | sampath srini | 50 | view |
2019-11-01 | harshalg007 | 42 | view |
- It has been said Not everything that is learned is contained in books, Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why? 80
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine."A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep t 50
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 50
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 10
- The following is from recent mail from Diord Corp, Human Resources Manager. " TObor Technologies found that mental health problems and mental illness were responsible for about 15 percent of employee sick days. Tobor amended its employee insurance plan so 50
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- OK
flaws:
No. of Words: 291 350
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 291 350
No. of Characters: 1405 1500
No. of Different Words: 157 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.13 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.828 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.543 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 98 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 73 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 50 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.71 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.328 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.582 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.061 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5