alpaca overcoat
The author of the argument purportedly asserts that the production of alpaca overcoat should continue by them again after five years. However the premises upon which he puts his claim are fallacious. For the support of which more well-established evidence should be given.
First, the author contends that they should start production of alpaca overcoat since that have found a supplier for high quality wool. However, it does not lend credence to the argument since there is no sufficient evidence to support if high quality wool is still a popular material for production of alpaca overcoat among consumers. One point that should be considered is that as the taste of people about clothes they buy are changing, there is no guarantee that people still like to wear wool clothes after five years, which is really a long time. It should also be noted that there is no valid evidence to show that this wool supplier is really a high quality one.
The author also attributes that the overcoat will be sold very well, since they have not produced them for five years and also because their major competitor no longer makes overcoat and therefore the demand for these costs are high. Although it might seem tenable at face, it has some detects, due to the lack of evidence to show that if the absence of them and their competitor has led to increasing the demand for these kind of coats. One of the main, if not the only, problem with premise is that the absence of their competitor in the market of these overcoat during this period of five years, might be because of reducing the demand for alpaca overcoats. This means that they not only won't have good sell, but may also face a terrible market in near future. Moreover, their absence may have pushed consumers to buy another kind of clothes and it may have change the taste of people itself.
Finally, as set forth by the author, since the price of other clothes has increased during this five years, they expect people to pay significantly for alpaca overcoats. Nevertheless, the rationale behind this premise could always been challenged owing to inadequate evidence to support if the increase in people's payment for the other kind of clothes means that they will pay equivalently for alpaca overcoats. One point that cannot go unnoticed is that people pay for clothes that are according to the fashion, so, if the alpaca overcoats is now an outdated cloth, consumers might not pay good amount of money for them and there is possibility that their factory run into a huge problem.
Having scrutinized the premises, a logical conclusion that can be drawn is that there is some evidence, having been ignored by the author, while the presence of which could add to the logic of each premise.
- tpo 51 3
- Do you think we should pay attention to opinion of famous people 93
- scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people. do you agree or disagree? 88
- people do many tasks to improve their natural environment. which of the following tasks do you prefer and why?1. plant trees and make parks2. using fewer plastic bags when shopping3. use public transportation 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The food we eat today is much healthier than in the past. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ontinue by them again after five years. However the premises upon which he puts his cla...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...or has led to increasing the demand for these kind of coats. One of the main, if not the o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 551, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this overcoat' or 'these overcoats'?
Suggestion: this overcoat; these overcoats
...ce of their competitor in the market of these overcoat during this period of five years, might...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'really', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.216374269006 0.25644967241 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.16179337232 0.15541462614 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0584795321637 0.0836205057962 70% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0682261208577 0.0520304965353 131% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0448343079922 0.0272364105082 165% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.155945419103 0.125424944231 124% => OK
Participles: 0.046783625731 0.0416121511921 112% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.41778134844 2.79052419416 87% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0253411306043 0.026700313972 95% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.107212475634 0.113004496875 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0331384015595 0.0255425247493 130% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0155945419103 0.0127820249294 122% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2752.0 2731.13054187 101% => OK
No of words: 474.0 446.07635468 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.805907173 6.12365571057 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.57801047555 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.322784810127 0.378187486979 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.221518987342 0.287650121315 77% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.149789029536 0.208842608468 72% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0801687763713 0.135150697306 59% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41778134844 2.79052419416 87% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 207.018472906 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.438818565401 0.469332199767 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 49.1032356632 52.1807786196 94% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.039408867 80% => OK
Sentence length: 29.625 23.2022227129 128% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6595681444 57.7814097925 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.0 141.986410481 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.625 23.2022227129 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.724660767414 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.58251231527 84% => OK
Readability: 51.7768987342 51.9672348444 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.52482269504 1.8405768891 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114027160174 0.441005458295 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.192027941086 0.135418324435 142% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.088353805375 0.0829849096947 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.634551717989 0.58762219726 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.15266371769 0.147661913831 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06169238365 0.193483328276 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740906884722 0.0970749176394 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.375661214215 0.42659136922 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0769338472 0.0774707102158 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0800830812535 0.312017818177 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432184785959 0.0698173142475 62% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.33743842365 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.87684729064 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.82512315271 62% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 6.46551724138 93% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 5.36822660099 112% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.82389162562 106% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 14.657635468 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.