"Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lobby is to widen the highway, adding an additional lane of traffic. Oppo

Essay topics:

"Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lobby is to widen the highway, adding an additional lane of traffic. Opponents note that last year's addition of a lane to the nearby Green Highway was followed by a worsening of traffic jams on it. Their suggested alternative proposal is adding a bicycle lane to Blue Highway. Many area residents are keen bicyclists. A bicycle lane would encourage them to use bicycles to commute, it is argued, thereby reducing rush-hour traffic."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.

The author present the problem of increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway. He then presents a plausible solution- additional lane. However, comparing the Green Highway results, the author rejects the solution. Here the author make varied unwarranted assumptions about the highways . The author then proceeds stating another solution- a bicycle lane. Though the reasoning is faulty, the author finally concludes that the bicycle lane will be advantageous. Because of lack of evidences, the assumptions made were erroneous and hence the conclusion is ill-founded.

Th...

*** The full content of this essay is available to VIP readers

Votes
Average: 7.6 (8 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-15 p30kh40 63 view
2019-11-26 Nithin Narla 73 view
2019-11-16 PRABINADHIKARI45 55 view
2019-11-03 Yongrok_Jeong 63 view
2019-11-02 OliverRaab 55 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user aaish :

Comments

argument 1 -- OK

argument 2 -- OK

argument 3 -- OK

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 6
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 30 15
No. of Words: 488 350
No. of Characters: 2451 1500
No. of Different Words: 226 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.7 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.023 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.625 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 177 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 138 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 84 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 62 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.267 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.004 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.533 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.302 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.458 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.084 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5