The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:
A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for their own college-aged children. Therefore, Seatown should institute a free-tuition policy for its professors for the purpose of enhancing morale among the faculty and luring new professors
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument
The argument given above is based on a faulty reasoning and assumptions. One cannot simply assume that all the conditions that exist at Oceania University are prevailing at Seatown University.
The most common assumption is the free tuition policy will attract professors based on study conducted in Oceania university. The faculty at Oceania university must be having the college aged children. So the policy implemented their would be beneficial. But we cannot firmly say that all the professors in Seatown University also have children between age of 18-22. A professor who is bachelor or just married may not have child. Hence the policy won't necessarily lure him. Unless a survey is conducted, we cannot know for sure. Thus, it would be wrong to just implement the policy without necessary investigation.
Also, the professors must believe that the education facilities provided at Oceania University are good. Hence they are inclined towards sending their children to college at Oceania University. But it cannot be said that Seatown University provides the same level of education. It must be the average rated college or below average as well. If this is the case, even if the policy is implemented, it is likely that professors will consider some other college than Seatown. As a result their won't be positive effective policy. It would be waste of resources additionally. There are many cases where just because of job pay grade people work at particular place but they don't respect it.
Moreover, the apathy towards working in Seatown university might also be the reason. People hate to work where conditions are not good. May it be financial conditions, health conditions, job security, work load, etc. The result of this is lack of interest towards work. If such conditions exist in Seatown University, people will not like to work there. A professor who have to travel 30 miles daily from his home to University would be frustrated eventually. He might choose to quit the job. Thus, implementing a free tuition policy will not be fruitful.
If assumptions above are similar to that of Oceania University, there might be a chance for free tuition policy for attract the professors. Even then a complete study is necessary to reach any conclusion.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-08 | Keerthi98 | 33 | view |
2019-12-02 | Opak Pulu | 58 | view |
2019-10-31 | solankis304 | 63 | view |
2019-10-16 | Deepali24 | 69 | view |
2019-10-14 | Siddhivinayak Shanbhagd | 49 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 50
- Your government has announced that it wishes to build a social house near your community Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this new influence on your community 85
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish 16
- 4-Day WorkweekThe popular 5-day workweek has long been a staple in U.S. business. With employees working 8 hours a day for a total of 40 hours a week, it has been seen as a model of efficiency. However, some companies and government agencies have begun co 70
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppor 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 432, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...lor or just married may not have child. Hence the policy wont necessarily lure him. U...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat the education facilities provided at Oceania University are good. Hence they ...
^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ovided at Oceania University are good. Hence they are inclined towards sending their...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 474, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nsider some other college than Seatown. As a result their wont be positive effecti...
^^
Line 3, column 670, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...eople work at particular place but they dont respect it. Moreover, the apathy towa...
^^^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for attract the professors. Even then a complete study is necessary to reach any...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'well', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.264423076923 0.25644967241 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.168269230769 0.15541462614 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0697115384615 0.0836205057962 83% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0697115384615 0.0520304965353 134% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0408653846154 0.0272364105082 150% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.0985576923077 0.125424944231 79% => OK
Participles: 0.0360576923077 0.0416121511921 87% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.77531189767 2.79052419416 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0216346153846 0.026700313972 81% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0769230769231 0.113004496875 68% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0456730769231 0.0255425247493 179% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0144230769231 0.0127820249294 113% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2263.0 2731.13054187 83% => OK
No of words: 371.0 446.07635468 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.09973045822 6.12365571057 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.57801047555 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.369272237197 0.378187486979 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.280323450135 0.287650121315 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.180592991914 0.208842608468 86% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.148247978437 0.135150697306 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77531189767 2.79052419416 99% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 207.018472906 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501347708895 0.469332199767 107% => OK
Word variations: 53.5969691413 52.1807786196 103% => OK
How many sentences: 28.0 20.039408867 140% => OK
Sentence length: 13.25 23.2022227129 57% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8236191414 57.7814097925 50% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8214285714 141.986410481 57% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.25 23.2022227129 57% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.392857142857 0.724660767414 54% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.58251231527 167% => OK
Readability: 41.2823450135 51.9672348444 79% => OK
Elegance: 1.43103448276 1.8405768891 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.490549627748 0.441005458295 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0676957720934 0.135418324435 50% => Sentence sentence coherence is low.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0626551303591 0.0829849096947 76% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.418200466666 0.58762219726 71% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.127265838556 0.147661913831 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153356868644 0.193483328276 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119582442125 0.0970749176394 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.33741352034 0.42659136922 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0818866952105 0.0774707102158 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.334368275689 0.312017818177 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586062428695 0.0698173142475 84% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.33743842365 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.87684729064 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.82512315271 187% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 6.46551724138 77% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 5.36822660099 130% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.82389162562 142% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 14.657635468 109% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.