The argument claims that the human resources emplyee suggests to allow the employees to work only within the 40 hours per week to complete their works to avoid mistakes in documents. Stated in this way the argument fails to mentions several key factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluated. The argument's conclusion is based on presumptions for which there is no any conclusive evidence. As a result, the argument is weak, unpersuasive and riddled with errors.
First, the argument readily assumes that the employees in the firm agree with the survey about work habits without knowing what are the reasons behind this decision or how their work quality will be superb. This statement is stretch and not substantiated in any way. The argument could have been much clearer if it explicitly provides suggestions or recommendations from the empolyees themselves to enhance the work quality.
Second, the argument claims that based on internal survey people how work 48 hours as an extra time will also make errors which means msitakes can happened also if they took more hours to work, so no one can prohibit the mistakes just by reduce or increase the time limit. This is again a very weak and unsupported claim as the argument does not provide any correlation between the number of errors and the number of mistakes. However, if the empolyee have an incentiveor punciment to work will not fail. If the argument had been provided evidence about who are these managers how fill the survey it would have been a lot more convincing.
Finally, may empolyees in corporations can waste their time and work under pressure especially, if they have a limited time which increase the chance to make more errors in the work, so employees have to work in comfortable and without pressure on on them to avoid the msitakes.
In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the reasons stated above, thus unconvincing. It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned all the relevant facts to the work such as the volume of the work and the reqirments of the employees. It is necessary to have a complete knowledge of all the contributing factors in order to evaluate the merits of a specific decision.
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 50
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for t
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 50
- The following memo was published by the Welzaton City Commission A recent nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a safety helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whe 55
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 08 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 9 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 375 350
No. of Characters: 1804 1500
No. of Different Words: 185 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.401 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.811 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.665 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 122 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 96 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 73 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.905 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.357 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.588 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.068 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggests allowing'.
Suggestion: suggests allowing
...claims that the human resources emplyee suggests to allow the employees to work only within the 4...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'mention'.
Suggestion: mention
...tated in this way the argument fails to mentions several key factors, on the basis of wh...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arguments'' or 'argument's'?
Suggestion: arguments'; argument's
...sis of which it could be evaluated. The arguments conclusion is based on presumptions for...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 369, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ased on presumptions for which there is no any conclusive evidence. As a result, t...
^^
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee have an incentiveor punciment to work will not fail. If the argument had been ...
^^
Line 5, column 507, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...iveor punciment to work will not fail. If the argument had been provided evidence...
^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: on
...ork in comfortable and without pressure on on them to avoid the msitakes. In concl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, thus, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 2260.96107784 82% => OK
No of words: 375.0 441.139720559 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92266666667 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72939553748 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 204.123752495 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506666666667 0.468620217663 108% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 705.55239521 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.3895676355 57.8364921388 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.066666667 119.503703932 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.324526521 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 5.70786347227 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148235403368 0.218282227539 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490353690698 0.0743258471296 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468920862605 0.0701772020484 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887457957989 0.128457276422 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04661521146 0.0628817314937 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.3550499002 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.5979740519 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 98.500998004 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.