In this memo, the chariperson analyzed the previous two years' recycling gabage affair in this town.Due to more residents like recycling in the future, the author predicts that the availavle space in this town's landfill should last for conseiderably longer that predited before. While this conclusion is not well supported by the evidence and reasoning. There are some loopholes in this memo, Let's reexamin them carefully.
To begin with, the author does not show us the annual garbage disposal of this town. Because the fact told by him that the residents have been recycling twice as much material as they did in the last two years than before shows no obvious evdence that the landfill of garbage disposal will last for a longer time. That is to say, if the garbages after recycled are not transfred into gas or fluid ,which could vaporate into the sky or drain into water, there must be a proper place for the final trash. Thus another important point which the author does not tell us is the content of these recycling gabage, they may need a final palce to be stored.
Secondly, the author predicts the amount of recycled material including paper,plastic, and metal should further increase in the next month, because the charge for these garbage will double. I belive all these garbage should be taken to a place in the end no matter what's the final patter they are. Thus this evidence is insufficient to the conclusion that the landfill will last for a longer time.I suggests tha author should make a wide survey to figur out how do the residents recycle their garbage.
In additon, given that 90 percent of residents wont to recycle more in the future, but this evidence shows no compelling support to the concluion made by the atuhor. Althougg the redisents are willing to reclyle more, while the author should find out why they want to do this more than before. A siginificant point lightens us that the charge for pick up of other household garbage will double, while like I said, unless these recycled garbage vaporized or flew into water, they all should be stored underground. So it is essential of finding out the current garbage disposal in the town's landfill, classifying these garbage is important to the author to make clear the situation now likewise.
Finally, the author predict the space of landfill will last for a conseiderably longer time.But the space of the landfill is not determined merely by the volume of garbage disposal. Duo to the development of the town, there maybe more people live in the town which means more gaebage at the same time, thus the comprehensive survey fot this predication is necessary.
In conclusion, the chairperson's predication is not well supported by the evidence, because the recylcing specficis are not told to us, give the dynamic population, he should make a wide survey.
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College."To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current 50
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and 50
- Educators should take students' interests into account when planning the content of the courses they teach.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Claim: When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students. Reason: Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying.Write a response in which you discuss the ext 50
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: In this memo, the chariperson analyzed the previous two years' recycling gabage affair in this town.Due to more residents like recycling in the future, the author predicts that the availavle space in this town's landfill should last for conseiderably longer that predited before.
Error: chariperson Suggestion: chairperson
Error: availavle Suggestion: available
Error: gabage Suggestion: garage
Error: predited Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: conseiderably Suggestion: considerably
Sentence: There are some loopholes in this memo, Let's reexamin them carefully.
Error: reexamin Suggestion: reexamine
Sentence: Because the fact told by him that the residents have been recycling twice as much material as they did in the last two years than before shows no obvious evdence that the landfill of garbage disposal will last for a longer time.
Error: evdence Suggestion: evidence
Sentence: That is to say, if the garbages after recycled are not transfred into gas or fluid ,which could vaporate into the sky or drain into water, there must be a proper place for the final trash.
Error: vaporate Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: transfred Suggestion: transfer
Sentence: Thus another important point which the author does not tell us is the content of these recycling gabage, they may need a final palce to be stored.
Error: may Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: gabage Suggestion: garage
Error: palce Suggestion: pace
Sentence: I belive all these garbage should be taken to a place in the end no matter what's the final patter they are.
Error: belive Suggestion: believe
Sentence: Thus this evidence is insufficient to the conclusion that the landfill will last for a longer time.I suggests tha author should make a wide survey to figur out how do the residents recycle their garbage.
Error: tha Suggestion: than
Error: figur Suggestion: figure
Sentence: In additon, given that 90 percent of residents wont to recycle more in the future, but this evidence shows no compelling support to the concluion made by the atuhor.
Error: atuhor Suggestion: author
Error: additon Suggestion: addition
Error: concluion Suggestion: conclusion
Sentence: Althougg the redisents are willing to reclyle more, while the author should find out why they want to do this more than before.
Error: reclyle Suggestion: recline
Error: redisents Suggestion: resents
Sentence: A siginificant point lightens us that the charge for pick up of other household garbage will double, while like I said, unless these recycled garbage vaporized or flew into water, they all should be stored underground.
Error: siginificant Suggestion: significant
Error: vaporized Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Finally, the author predict the space of landfill will last for a conseiderably longer time.But the space of the landfill is not determined merely by the volume of garbage disposal.
Error: conseiderably Suggestion: considerably
Sentence: Duo to the development of the town, there maybe more people live in the town which means more gaebage at the same time, thus the comprehensive survey fot this predication is necessary.
Error: gaebage Suggestion: garbage
Error: fot Suggestion: fort
Sentence: In conclusion, the chairperson's predication is not well supported by the evidence, because the recylcing specficis are not told to us, give the dynamic population, he should make a wide survey.
Error: recylcing Suggestion: recycling
Error: specficis Suggestion: specifics
--------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 25 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 487 350
No. of Characters: 2305 1500
No. of Different Words: 218 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.698 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.733 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.463 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 160 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 110 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 78 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 45 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.647 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.165 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.765 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.343 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.605 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.133 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Due
...rs recycling gabage affair in this town.Due to more residents like recycling in the...
^^^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...cled are not transfred into gas or fluid ,which could vaporate into the sky or dra...
^^
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... be a proper place for the final trash. Thus another important point which the autho...
^^^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , plastic
...unt of recycled material including paper,plastic, and metal should further increase in t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this garbage' or 'these garbages'?
Suggestion: this garbage; these garbages
... the next month, because the charge for these garbage will double. I belive all these garbage...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
...charge for these garbage will double. I belive all these garbage should be taken to a plac...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this garbage' or 'these garbages'?
Suggestion: this garbage; these garbages
...these garbage will double. I belive all these garbage should be taken to a place in the end n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...e taken to a place in the end no matter whats the final patter they are. Thus this ev...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...matter whats the final patter they are. Thus this evidence is insufficient to the co...
^^^^
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...he landfill will last for a longer time.I suggests tha author should make a wide ...
^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'suggest'
Suggestion: suggest
... landfill will last for a longer time.I suggests tha author should make a wide survey to...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 612, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this garbage' or 'these garbages'?
Suggestion: this garbage; these garbages
...osal in the towns landfill, classifying these garbage is important to the author to make clea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 93, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...ll last for a conseiderably longer time.But the space of the landfill is not determ...
^^^
Line 11, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'chairpersons'' or 'chairperson's'?
Suggestion: chairpersons'; chairperson's
...ion is necessary. In conclusion, the chairpersons predication is not well supported by th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, likewise, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 28.8173652695 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 55.5748502994 108% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2368.0 2260.96107784 105% => OK
No of words: 483.0 441.139720559 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90269151139 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55747305778 2.78398813304 92% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 204.123752495 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469979296066 0.468620217663 100% => OK
syllable_count: 741.6 705.55239521 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.70958083832 295% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.8473053892 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.7906368104 57.8364921388 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.294117647 119.503703932 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4117647059 23.324526521 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 5.70786347227 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 5.25449101796 266% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110498916292 0.218282227539 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406217745649 0.0743258471296 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282491994272 0.0701772020484 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636734366897 0.128457276422 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246200724835 0.0628817314937 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.3799401198 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.3550499002 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.5979740519 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 98.500998004 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.1389221557 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.