The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books.
"We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base because it is known for its wide selection of books on all subjects. Clearly, opening the café would attract more customers. Space could be made for the café by discontinuing the children's book section, which will probably become less popular given that the most recent national census indicated a significant decline in the percentage of the population under age ten. Opening a café will allow Monarch to attract more customers and better compete with Regal Books, which recently opened its own café."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
The Board of Directors decides to open a café in Monarch Books to increase attraction of costumers and be able to compete more with Regal Books. The board comes to this conclusion based on the observation of the Regal Books and other factors. Even the decision of the Board of Directors might be plausible, they must provide answer to these three questions to determine the persuasiveness of the argument.
First of all, Does the national census of children under ten be the immaculate indication of the children of the town where the book store is located? It might be possible that the children in the area where the store is located might have a greater number of children under ten year of age but due to decrease in number of children in other states caused to decrease in overall average of the population of the children. So, removing children section might cause more loss then the profit gained by starting the café. If this is true, then the argument does not hold water.
Moreover, Is the location of the Monarch Books in a convenient area where people can often come to sit and read. It is possible that Monarch Books is situated far from the current city area where people only go by compulsion to buy or rent book because it has wide variety of collection and the books may not be found elsewhere. Travelling a long distance just to sit and read is extremely aberrant. Also, the book store may be near to a factory or airport where there is much noise. So, simply sitting there for reading might be uncomfortable for the costumers. If this is the case, then the credibility of the conclusion of the argument is hindered.
Finally, Are the Monarch Books and Regal Books comparable? Perhaps Monarch Books have costumers who prefer taking the book to home rather than just sit there and read whole day whereas the Regal Books have more free customers who tend to sit in the store for reading than carrying the book to their place. In addition, the café organized by the Regal Books might be too good with its food quality, customer service and a wide and spacious place for people to sit and read without being disturbed by others which obviously cannot be provided by Monarch Books. If any of these scenarios have merit, then the argument is significantly weakened.
Thus, in conclusion, the argument, as it stands now, is considerably flawed due to its reliance on unwarranted assumptions. If the author is able to provide explanations to these three questions (based on a systematic study approach), then the viability of the recommendation can be fully evaluated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-08 | chakravarthy8919 | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-21 | Anirudha Balaji Shirsikar | 60 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | Dimple Nachnani | 68 | view |
| 2021-01-01 | co1862 | 60 | view |
| 2020-11-19 | priyankasjadhav | 78 | view |
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 62
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual s levels of stimulation The study showed that in stimulating situat 30
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 66
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College To serve the housing needs of our students Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories Buckingham s enrollment is growing and based on current tren 58
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities 50
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 449 350
No. of Characters: 2088 1500
No. of Different Words: 208 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.603 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.65 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.552 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 127 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 107 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 76 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 41 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.632 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.283 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.789 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.322 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.322 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.093 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 474, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
... children section might cause more loss then the profit gained by starting the café....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.6327345309 127% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 28.8173652695 56% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 55.5748502994 119% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 2260.96107784 95% => OK
No of words: 449.0 441.139720559 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75946547884 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62122094681 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 204.123752495 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469933184855 0.468620217663 100% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 705.55239521 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.6691089119 57.8364921388 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.473684211 119.503703932 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6315789474 23.324526521 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84210526316 5.70786347227 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311230640889 0.218282227539 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094642274191 0.0743258471296 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851333675829 0.0701772020484 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16418154019 0.128457276422 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857772765788 0.0628817314937 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.3799401198 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.3550499002 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.5979740519 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 98.500998004 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.