In the preceding argument, the author claims that Acme company has to encourage its employees to take the easy read course that will help to increase the company profits and will boost the employees positions, the conclusion of the argument is based on the following premises. Firstly, he claims that many other companies have stated their employees to take it. Secondly, he bolsters his position by stating that one graduate employee was able to read 500 pages within 2 hours and another one rose from assistant manager to vice president in under one year by taking this course. Thirdly, he states that the course will cost $500 and it is low price compering to the benefit that will get and long life subscription to the easy read newsletter. Hence, in the first glance it may seem plausible. However, careful scrutiny sheds light on plethora of assumptions that could undermine the value of the argument.
To begin with, the author assumes what hold true and useful for the other companies will mandatory hold the same benefit to the Acme company. But this assumption weaken the argument because we do not have any information about the other companies general status, and what is the problem they have. Perhaps the Acme company complains from different gabs or perhaps their worker level is better than the other companies. Thus, the argument is without basis and he has to provide full details about the companies status and how they get benefit from the course.
Furthermore, even there is a concrete and positive relation between taking the course and get benefit from it, such what happened with the graduate employees. This does not necessarily indicate a conspicuous relation between the two events. Perhaps the employee who read 500 pages did not read it precisely and in fact is not plausible to read 500 pages within two ours in meticulous way and absorbs all the benefits. Plus, the employee who took the course and got higher position it might be that the author is right, but he does not provide complete information to corroborate his case. Perhaps he got higher position because he has an outstanding abilities or perhaps he has an entice to improve his position. Consequently, building a decision depends on weak causation is not plausible an he has to provide more valuable information to boost the argument.
Last but not least, the largest leap in the argument also lies in stating that the course will cost $500 for every employee with life long subscription. In deed, he fails again to mention that this cost is low. Perhaps the Acme company has a large team and by this way the company has to pay for all of them, how they will increase the productivity while the company will pay a lot of money. Further, what is the benefit from the life long subscription. Accordingly, the argument is lack a depth of details and he has to provide more information to boost the argument.
All in all, the argument fails to mention one key factor. Namely, all the previous assumptions are equivocal. Thus, without complete information the argument is unsubstantiated and opened to debate.
- People should not be misled by the advertising competition between Coldex and Cold-Away, both popular over-the-counter cold medications that anyone can purchase without a doctor's prescription. Each brand is accusing the other of causing some well-known, 78
- The following appeared as part of a business plan developed by the manager of the Rialto Movie Theater."Despite its downtown location, the Rialto Movie Theater, a local institution for five decades, must make big changes or close i 69
- tpo 22 70
- Nowadays we live in very complex modern life. So, we have to do many and different task to fill our days in fruitful tasks. While, others prefer doing one task in all their day long. And in my point of view doing many tasks is very important to live more 70
- In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: a; the
...as to encourage their employees to take a the easy read course that will help to incr...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 503, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...e has to provide full details about the companies status and how they get benefit from th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 613, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'ability'?
Suggestion: ability
... position because he has an outstanding abilities or perhaps he has an entice to improve ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 641, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...outstanding abilities or perhaps he has an entice to improve his position. Consequently, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 753, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ends on weak causation is not plausible an he has to provide more valuable informa...
^^
Line 5, column 753, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'he'?
Suggestion: an; he
...ends on weak causation is not plausible an he has to provide more valuable informatio...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, as to, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 11.1786427146 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 28.8173652695 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 55.5748502994 106% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 16.3942115768 177% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2466.0 2260.96107784 109% => OK
No of words: 502.0 441.139720559 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91235059761 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.56307096286 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61806042881 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 204.123752495 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456175298805 0.468620217663 97% => OK
syllable_count: 755.1 705.55239521 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 19.7664670659 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.430112213 57.8364921388 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 119.503703932 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 23.324526521 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.70786347227 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245505313131 0.218282227539 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657677696079 0.0743258471296 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797526805126 0.0701772020484 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128050559069 0.128457276422 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101404822436 0.0628817314937 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.3799401198 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.5979740519 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.32208582834 89% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 98.500998004 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 12.3882235529 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.