An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be paid subsidies for farming the new variety of millet. Since millet is already a staple food in Tagus, people will readily adopt the new variety. To combat vitamin A deficiency, the government of Tagus should do everything it can to promote this new type of millet.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
The author, in the argument, recommends that the government of the Tagus, an impoverished nation having vitamin A deficient peoples, should promote a new type of vitamin A contained millet anyhow. The author also presents various facts to bolster his argument. Superficially, the author's conclusion seems to be well-reasoned and sound. However, under the meticulous study, there are a plethora of questions the author needs to be answered to validate his conclusion. Otherwise, the recommendation made by my author may not result in predictions.
Firstly, how severely the Tagus is hit by vitamin A deficiency? How many people are found to be vitamin A deficient? The author should present the details about the demographics of vitamin A deficiency in the Tagus. If there are only a few people which are found to be vitamin A deficient, is it wise to spend the high budget on costly millet farming? Perhaps, there are only a few people which are vitamin A deficient. If so, the author's recommendation to adopt the millet farming is not economically warranted.
Secondly, is the environmental condition suitable for millet farming? The author mentions that the millet is the staple food in the Tagus but did not say anything about whether the people of Tagus grow millet in their farm or import from foreign countries. If the environmental condition is not suitable for millet farming in the Tagus, the author's recommendation of millet farming would be absurd. And the vitamin A deficiency of people of Tagus cannot be improved.
Finally, since the author is failed to answer the questions mentioned above, the author's recommendation might not result in the predicted results. To make his recommendations sounder, the author needs to do more research and answer those questions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-20 | Dinesh4518 | 63 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Nowshin Tabassum | 69 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | Gnyana | 68 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Prasad002 | 59 | view |
| 2023-07-08 | tanvik21 | 74 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 50
- How road maintenance and construction works could continue to generate local employment adopting social distancing requirements to minimize COVID 19 virus infection risks in Nepal 73
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 50
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field 50
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 289 350
No. of Characters: 1456 1500
No. of Different Words: 135 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.123 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.038 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.953 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 118 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 81 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 54 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.608 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.588 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.393 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.393 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.146 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'people'?
Suggestion: people
...ished nation having vitamin A deficient peoples, should promote a new type of vitamin A...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...olster his argument. Superficially, the authors conclusion seems to be well-reasoned an...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 105, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...How many people are found to be vitamin A deficient? The author should present the details ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 408, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...are only a few people which are vitamin A deficient. If so, the authors recommendation to a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 432, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ich are vitamin A deficient. If so, the authors recommendation to adopt the millet farm...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...le for millet farming in the Tagus, the authors recommendation of millet farming would ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 82, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...swer the questions mentioned above, the authors recommendation might not result in the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 13.6137724551 29% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 28.8173652695 31% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 55.5748502994 63% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 2260.96107784 66% => OK
No of words: 289.0 441.139720559 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16955017301 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.56307096286 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05269940729 2.78398813304 110% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 204.123752495 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487889273356 0.468620217663 104% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 705.55239521 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2136400355 57.8364921388 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8823529412 119.503703932 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 23.324526521 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70588235294 5.70786347227 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294093548821 0.218282227539 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112172755469 0.0743258471296 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940847541285 0.0701772020484 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173304416705 0.128457276422 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982814177944 0.0628817314937 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.3799401198 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.3550499002 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 98.500998004 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 12.3882235529 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.