“Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men and women into space. Therefore, we should invest our resources in unmanned space flight."
The editors argument that the manned space flight should be preferred over manned space flight because of lower cost and the lesser risk factor is flawed. As he has drawn his argument based on many hidden assumptions which, if are untrue will seriously affect the conclusion. Let us discuss them in detail and study how those assumptions will affect the given argument.
The editor has stated that the manned space flight is costly but he has not specifically mentioned the exact cost of the flight. He has also stated that the unmanned space flight costs lesser compared to manned space flight but he failed to specify that on what basis the cost is determined. It might be possible the unmanned space flight might have high maintenance cost. Thus if the maintenance cost is very high for unmanned space flight it might result in more money being spent after the flight had taken off.
The author had also failed to compare the overall performance of the both the space flights. It might be possible that the information obtained from the unmanned space flight is comparatively less accurate than manned space flight. Thus if such is the case then the investment in unmanned space flight becomes skeptical. The author also has not mentioned about the durability of the manned flight and have assumed that it is proportionate with the manned space flight.
However, the editor also strengthens his argument by mentioning about the safety factor associated with both the flights. We have seen many accidents occurring in the past where several astronauts have sacrificed their life for the development in the field of science. Thus, an unmanned space flight will be less risky.
The argument made by the editor could have been strengthened by adding more information and statistics about the overall cost of both the flights and the reliability and durability of the unmanned flight. As it stands, however, the argument is flawed for the reasons indicated.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 16
- “Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending m 50
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 83
- “Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending m 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 5, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'editors'' or 'editor's'?
Suggestion: editors'; editor's
The editors argument that the manned space flight s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...light might have high maintenance cost. Thus if the maintenance cost is very high fo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...less accurate than manned space flight. Thus if such is the case then the investment...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'thus']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.227665706052 0.25644967241 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.193083573487 0.15541462614 124% => OK
Adjectives: 0.106628242075 0.0836205057962 128% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0489913544669 0.0520304965353 94% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0432276657061 0.0272364105082 159% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.115273775216 0.125424944231 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0749279538905 0.0416121511921 180% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.5319740112 2.79052419416 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00864553314121 0.026700313972 32% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0028818443804 0.001811407834 159% => OK
Determiners: 0.132564841499 0.113004496875 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0259365994236 0.0255425247493 102% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0115273775216 0.0127820249294 90% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1963.0 2731.13054187 72% => OK
No of words: 326.0 446.07635468 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.02147239264 6.12365571057 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.57801047555 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.361963190184 0.378187486979 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.223926380368 0.287650121315 78% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.168711656442 0.208842608468 81% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.101226993865 0.135150697306 75% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5319740112 2.79052419416 91% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 207.018472906 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450920245399 0.469332199767 96% => OK
Word variations: 44.8773095346 52.1807786196 86% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.039408867 80% => OK
Sentence length: 20.375 23.2022227129 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3536178215 57.7814097925 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.6875 141.986410481 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 23.2022227129 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.4375 0.724660767414 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.58251231527 84% => OK
Readability: 42.7676380368 51.9672348444 82% => OK
Elegance: 1.46464646465 1.8405768891 80% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423299132337 0.441005458295 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.156699975861 0.135418324435 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.127012378231 0.0829849096947 153% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.651618179896 0.58762219726 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.143641730574 0.147661913831 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202116935149 0.193483328276 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103060630128 0.0970749176394 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.524466516244 0.42659136922 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.100373128127 0.0774707102158 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305407405228 0.312017818177 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062723586265 0.0698173142475 90% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.33743842365 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.87684729064 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.82512315271 83% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 6.46551724138 31% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 5.36822660099 130% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.82389162562 142% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 14.657635468 89% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.