Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
To evaluate the argument, we need to weigh how frequently people actually contract the disease and die versus how frequently people would die if the inoculation is administered to them. If the former is much more dominant, it would, in fact, make sense to administer the inoculation considering they would have a better chance at survival and longetivity in that case. However, if that is not substantially higher, it is, in its entirety, an incorrect exercise to administer the inoculation and gamble with a citizen's life.
Moreover, it is also importnat to know whether contracting cow flu will actually result in a death even if the specialized healthcare is provided. If that is not the case, then, relying on an inoculation associated with a high risk would be a very dense idea. Investing in specialized heathcare and ensuring its availability would make much more sense.
Additionally, to evaluate the argument, it would be useful to note whether contracting cow flu is more often based on proximity to cattle, consumption habits, medical history, gender, age and genetics among other things. More clarity on the correlation with these can help in identifying a group that is, perhaps, at a significantly higher risk of contracting the deadly disease than others in the affected area. In this case, administration of inoculation could prove to be fundamental in safeguarding the quality and length of their life. The gamble might start making more sense in a scenario like this for the identified group. It essentially boils down to judging the odds of survival for either case.
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 70
- Some tasks are for men only. 83
- Before pouncing on the suggested move, it is important to scrutinize what has been presented here. A thorough analysis of certain points will help the Production Company in taking an informed decision about the next fortiuous strategy. 35
- Manned space flights should not be invested in. 74
- ucial that the young understand this idea very well and the reasoning behind it very well. Instilling qualites like co-operation in them from an early age becomes very pressing. 58
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 260 350
No. of Characters: 1294 1500
No. of Different Words: 145 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.016 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.977 4.6
Word Length SD: 3 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 88 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 67 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 55 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.636 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.227 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.455 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.364 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.538 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.046 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 510, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...ister the inoculation and gamble with a citizens life. Moreover, it is also importn...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, moreover, so, then, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 13.6137724551 29% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 28.8173652695 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 55.5748502994 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 2260.96107784 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 260.0 441.139720559 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13846153846 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.56307096286 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03808176789 2.78398813304 109% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 204.123752495 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.468620217663 119% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 705.55239521 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7622313506 57.8364921388 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.454545455 119.503703932 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 23.324526521 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.70786347227 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.15768463074 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159289706855 0.218282227539 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558997967502 0.0743258471296 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441138055362 0.0701772020484 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10811562758 0.128457276422 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336509694127 0.0628817314937 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.3550499002 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.197005988 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.5979740519 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 98.500998004 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 12.3882235529 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.