The argument claims that reducing the maximum water flow to its one-third would help Sunnyside Corporation to increase savings and would be able to earn higher profits if the same methodology is further applied to all the twelve buildings in the complex. Stated in this way,the argument manipulates fact and conveys a distorted view of position. The conclusion of the argument relies on assumptions which clearly reflects signs of poor reasoning. Below mentioned are reasonable points that would help understand my disagreement.
Firstly, the basic fault in the argument is that it mistakens the decrement in the water flow for the reduced usage of water. If a person needs five buckets of water in a day, then decreasing the water flow does not make the person only two buckets of water. Infact, this method will become a difficulty for the person as he has to wait for longer period of time to fill up the bucket. Therefore, the basis of the argument is faulty and hence any conclusion build over such claim would not be stand in the long run.
Secondly, the argument emphasizes on increased savings without either taking the the readings nor the bills into account. This statement is a stretch and not substantiated in any way. For instance, if the argument provided with proper evidence regarding the bills of water usage before and after the adjustment, we could have made a comparison and conclude whether the profit made is considerable or not.
Finally, the claim does not give clarity on the number of complaints they encountered. It vaguely says that they were "few" in number. However, it could vary from two to fifty depending on the number of residents in the society and if fifty people, lets say, are facing problems with lower water flow then it could not be ignored and any aim to reduce water flow should be discarded. Hence, only if information regarding the number of people facing problems is given, we could have landed on the firm acknowledgement of the conclusion.
In conclusion, the Sunnyside Corporaion's mindset to apply the same technique to all the twelve buildings without firm evidence of the outputs in the earlier three buildings can prove to dangerous as then the number of complaints will definitely reach its peak. Ultimately, there is a clear possibility that the Corporation has to revert back to adjusting the water flow to the original level. This would lead to ignominy and distrust towards corporation. Therefore, the argument should provide with more evidences in order to validate the conclusion.
- To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current trends, will double over the next 50 years, thus making existing dormitory space inadequate. 29
- Critical judgement of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 91
- Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate. 65
- In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your re 58
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 04 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 426 350
No. of Characters: 2075 1500
No. of Different Words: 217 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.543 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.871 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.652 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 144 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 108 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 79 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 54 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.421 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.297 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.579 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.297 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.537 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.093 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...dings in the complex. Stated in this way,the argument manipulates fact and conveys a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...the person as he has to wait for longer period of time to fill up the bucket. Therefore, the b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...increased savings without either taking the the readings nor the bills into account. Th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...increased savings without either taking the the readings nor the bills into account. Th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, as to, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 55.5748502994 112% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 16.3942115768 128% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2138.0 2260.96107784 95% => OK
No of words: 425.0 441.139720559 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03058823529 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76999843853 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 204.123752495 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512941176471 0.468620217663 109% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 705.55239521 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9098655462 57.8364921388 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.526315789 119.503703932 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3684210526 23.324526521 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15789473684 5.70786347227 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227390226808 0.218282227539 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583220651376 0.0743258471296 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668310690647 0.0701772020484 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116781079626 0.128457276422 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229328858312 0.0628817314937 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.3799401198 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 98.500998004 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.