Plaza store owners
The author of the argument purportedly state that the number of skateboard users should be banned in plaza store because they have created many problems such as diminish in store owners business, vandalism and so forth. Owners believe that if skateboarding become prohibited, their business return to its previously high levels. However, the premises upon which he puts his claim are fallacious. For the support of which some critical, yet ignored question need to be addressed.
First the author contends that the number of skateboard users reduce the business of store owners. However, it does not lend credence to the argument since a question that might arise is whether skateboarding has deleterious effects on the business of plaza store owners or not. One point that should be considered is that economic recession can run every business into a huge problem and plaza store owners are not exception of this rule. In fact, inflation not only in plaza but also in every mall could contribute greatly to the reduction of business prosperity. It's also important to say that in today's hectic world, there are, majorities of shopping malls and maybe people are less likely to go shopping in plaza every day.
The author also attributes that presence of skateboards users caused dramatic increase in vandalism and litter. Although it might seems tenable at face, it has some detects since you can always ask this question if in what extent skateboard users can destroy public things and effects negatively on surrounding area. One of the main, if not the only, problem with the premise is that crowds of people in plaza are in rush, moving in and moving out. There is possibility that these people can bring many damages to the plaza store.
Finally as set forth by the author city ban skateboarding in central plaza will help store owners to return their previous stage. Nevertheless, the rationale behind the premise could be challenged owing to an unsettle question if prohibit skateboarding provide fertile ground for owners to reach their previously high level in plaza or not. One point that should not go unnoticed is that skateboarding is an enjoyable activity that can appeal vast majorities of people to the plaza. Indeed, there is possibility that many people go there because of skateboard users and if authorities banned skateboarding in plaza, perhaps the store owners lose their customers. In other word, skateboard users can be served as an advertisement for plaza store owners.
Having scrutinized the premises, a logical conclusion that can be drawn is that there are a number of questions, having been ignored by the author while the answer of which could add to the logic of each premises.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-13 | Anish Sapkota | 77 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | sijan | 53 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | ljh5034 | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | ctoluwasedaniel | 68 | view |
| 2022-06-23 | sag15 | 72 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree that progress is always good? 86
- The goal of politics should not be the pursuit of an ideal, but rather the search for common ground and reasonable consensus. 62
- tpo 48 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is difficult for teachers to be both popular liked by students and effective in helping students in learning 91
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ing many damages to the plaza store. Finally as set forth by the author city ban ska...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...he premise could be challenged owing to an unsettle question if prohibit skateboarding prov...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould add to the logic of each premises.
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'while', 'in fact', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.275720164609 0.25644967241 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.152263374486 0.15541462614 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0679012345679 0.0836205057962 81% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0576131687243 0.0520304965353 111% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0267489711934 0.0272364105082 98% => OK
Prepositions: 0.146090534979 0.125424944231 116% => OK
Participles: 0.0493827160494 0.0416121511921 119% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.65947031889 2.79052419416 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0246913580247 0.026700313972 92% => OK
Particles: 0.00205761316872 0.001811407834 114% => OK
Determiners: 0.0843621399177 0.113004496875 75% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0329218106996 0.0255425247493 129% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0185185185185 0.0127820249294 145% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2722.0 2731.13054187 100% => OK
No of words: 449.0 446.07635468 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.06236080178 6.12365571057 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.57801047555 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.363028953229 0.378187486979 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.244988864143 0.287650121315 85% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.178173719376 0.208842608468 85% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.113585746102 0.135150697306 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65947031889 2.79052419416 95% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 207.018472906 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481069042316 0.469332199767 103% => OK
Word variations: 53.9641707566 52.1807786196 103% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.039408867 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.6315789474 23.2022227129 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2166739358 57.7814097925 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.263157895 141.986410481 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6315789474 23.2022227129 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.631578947368 0.724660767414 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.58251231527 84% => OK
Readability: 48.1304653616 51.9672348444 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.99130434783 1.8405768891 108% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239310147752 0.441005458295 54% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.114213586692 0.135418324435 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0567564337193 0.0829849096947 68% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.537184065541 0.58762219726 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.141481857787 0.147661913831 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121773949066 0.193483328276 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107192004095 0.0970749176394 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.411268954248 0.42659136922 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0927437258055 0.0774707102158 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166993597177 0.312017818177 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112814007748 0.0698173142475 162% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.33743842365 60% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.87684729064 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.82512315271 83% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 6.46551724138 77% => OK
Negative topic words: 9.0 5.36822660099 168% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 14.657635468 109% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.