A recently issued twenty-year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates. Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. Although many foods are naturally rich in salicylates, food-processing companies also add salicylates to foods as preservatives. The twenty-year study found a correlation between the rise in the commercial use of salicylates and a steady decline in the average number of headaches reported by study participants. At the time when the study concluded, food-processing companies had just discovered that salicylates can also be used as flavor additives for foods, and, as a result, many companies plan to do so. Based on these study results, some health experts predict that residents of Mentia will suffer even fewer headaches in the future.
With the information provided, this assumption leading to conclusion remains unfounded. This argument is well presented yet fat-fetched. This assumption claims that there is strong correlation between the rise in the utilizing of salicylates and a steady reduce in the average number of headaches. Based on this survey, food processing company had just founded that salicylates can also be used as flavor additive for foods. Hence, this conclusion is ill-founded.
The primary assumption underlying the author of the conclusion is that major reason for declining headache is related to Salicylate. Nevertheless, he fails to preclude other possibility reason into account that indeed it could be because multiple reasons such as healthy lifestyle, having a great weather, eating fresh food, constant exercise. As a matter of fact, we all know that this event has a variety factors physical or mental. Want of such prudent answers to make the author assumption full of holes. So, to reinforce the argument the author should have discussed about other factors which is considerably crucial without a shadow of doubt.
Furthermore, the author of the statement avers that the more material would be worthwhile for preventing headache. However, he fails to take other possible reason into account that the more is not better. Indeed, the more substance would be pernicious. In fact, a modicum of amount of them would be useful. Whereas, overdose of salicylates may create undesirable effect on human body.
Moreover, the author of the assumption assumes that salicylates can cure headaches. Without considering and ruling that perhaps it prevents headache not cure forever. Besides, by considering this fact, knowing about their age is highly imperative due to the fact that majority of old people have an excessive headache during the day. Based on conclusion, it would be wrong that some health experts forestall that dwellers of Mentia will suffer fewer in the next day. Since, we cannot compare situation of nowadays with future.
In short, as discussed, this conclusion cannot tenable. The author of the statement should have provided information about other factors for decline headache such as exercise, great food and so forth. Besides, adding a plethora of this substance would not be beneficial. On the other hand to make a rigid conclusion is very myopic observation method. After all, feckless attempt with a fallible method could be noting a fool's errand.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-01 | Sophy@ | 57 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Dinesh4518 | 64 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | jayauen | 72 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | Prasad002 | 58 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | ShirishBasnet1 | 50 | view |
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today. 50
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 50
- Statement of purposes 80
- Eucation children is more a difficult task day than it was in the past because they spend so much them on cell phone, online games, and social networking web site؟ 50
- Parents today are more involved in their children's education than were parents in the past. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...icum of amount of them would be useful. Whereas, overdose of salicylates may create und...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 468, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ntia will suffer fewer in the next day. Since, we cannot compare situation of nowaday...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 421, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'fools'' or 'fool's'?
Suggestion: fools'; fool's
...ith a fallible method could be noting a fools errand.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, whereas, while, after all, in fact, in short, such as, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 28.8173652695 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 55.5748502994 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2087.0 2260.96107784 92% => OK
No of words: 390.0 441.139720559 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35128205128 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78673126394 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 204.123752495 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553846153846 0.468620217663 118% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 705.55239521 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.96107784431 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 19.7664670659 126% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.8473053892 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6697832195 57.8364921388 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.48 119.503703932 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6 23.324526521 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.70786347227 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.67664670659 192% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0680896181327 0.218282227539 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.019049532882 0.0743258471296 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0250740430858 0.0701772020484 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0400185449353 0.128457276422 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228190031288 0.0628817314937 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.3799401198 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.3550499002 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.5979740519 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 98.500998004 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 12.3882235529 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.1389221557 72% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.