The memo states that the stored food at a warehouse in Palm City is damaged by pests in a greater value than that in Wintervale, so the negligence Fly-away Company, which provides pest control services in Plam City, should be the reason for the damage. However, the facts presented in the memo are not enough for the conclusion and there are a lot of alternative explanations that can rival the proposed statement.
Firstly, the value of destroyed food may not represent the amount of food damaged by pests. The types of food stored in Palm City and Wintervale can be totally different. The different food certainly has different prices. For example, the warehouse in Palm City may store imported premium-grade beef which are much more expensive than the domestic vegetable stored in Wintervale warehouse. Therefore, only a few kilograms of damaged food in the Palm city warehouse can cost a lot more than several kilograms of damaged vegetable in Wintervale warehouse. For this reason, we cannot conclude that the Fly-away Company does not have the ability to control the pests in the Palm City warehouse because the pests in the Palm City Warehouse may be much less than other warehouses. The reason for the greater value of food loss may come from the expensive food stored in that warehouse.
Secondly, the difficulties to control pests in different locations are not the same. Palm City may be located in the warm and humid area, so there are many kinds of pests that can grow easily in that region. Meanwhile, Wintervale may situate in the cold and dry area which allows only a few species of pests to survive. Consequently, the performance of pest control in Palm City cannot be directly compared with that in the other cities of different locations. The company should confirm that the quantities and types of pests in those locations are the same before the damaged food can be used as a comparison criterion.
Last but not least, the memo shows the comparison in pest control between only two companies. Although the values of damaged food of these two companies are different, this value may be negligible comparing to the other pest control companies. There may be a third company that take a responsibility in the pest control of another warehouse and $100,000 worth of food is damaged from pests at this warehouse. This additional evidence can show that the performance of Fly Away and Buzzoff companies are both quite satisfied. Accordingly, the information on the results of other pest control companies is essentially required before the conclusion can be made.
All in all, these alternative explanations can rival the memo’s claim and make the memo flawed. Subsequently, a lot more data is needed in order to consider this issue thoroughly.
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for t 77
- It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 54
- Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.Reason: We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to 50
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. 50
- "Unfortunately, in contemporary society, creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image." - Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain 50
Essay evaluation report
----------------
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- not OK. The topic didn't ask to compare to other companies.
Suggested:
Maybe the size of the warehouse in Palm City is much bigger, suppose two warehouses hold same stuffs.
----------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 464 350
No. of Characters: 2253 1500
No. of Different Words: 182 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.641 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.856 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.642 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 148 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 122 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 84 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 69 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.095 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.591 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.348 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.556 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.105 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 881, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xpensive food stored in that warehouse. Secondly, the difficulties to control pe...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rder to consider this issue thoroughly.
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'therefore', 'third', 'while', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.279527559055 0.25644967241 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.133858267717 0.15541462614 86% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0767716535433 0.0836205057962 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0551181102362 0.0520304965353 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00196850393701 0.0272364105082 7% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.139763779528 0.125424944231 111% => OK
Participles: 0.0433070866142 0.0416121511921 104% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.75573579621 2.79052419416 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00984251968504 0.026700313972 37% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.141732283465 0.113004496875 125% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0393700787402 0.0255425247493 154% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.011811023622 0.0127820249294 92% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2784.0 2731.13054187 102% => OK
No of words: 464.0 446.07635468 104% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0 6.12365571057 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.57801047555 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.323275862069 0.378187486979 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.273706896552 0.287650121315 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.193965517241 0.208842608468 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.153017241379 0.135150697306 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75573579621 2.79052419416 99% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 207.018472906 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.403017241379 0.469332199767 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 44.4817128115 52.1807786196 85% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.039408867 105% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0952380952 23.2022227129 95% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1073940689 57.7814097925 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.571428571 141.986410481 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0952380952 23.2022227129 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 0.724660767414 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.58251231527 56% => OK
Readability: 49.4659277504 51.9672348444 95% => OK
Elegance: 2.42268041237 1.8405768891 132% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409876730991 0.441005458295 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.155924264559 0.135418324435 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0830522743583 0.0829849096947 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.622445782397 0.58762219726 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.114495129024 0.147661913831 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180358823398 0.193483328276 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819954599195 0.0970749176394 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.516091028273 0.42659136922 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.181370296033 0.0774707102158 234% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275870827269 0.312017818177 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923773673969 0.0698173142475 132% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.33743842365 60% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.87684729064 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.82512315271 187% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 6.46551724138 62% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 5.36822660099 93% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.82389162562 177% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 14.657635468 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.