SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middleburg, the home of SuperCorp's current headquarters. Moreover, Mid

Essay topics:

SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middleburg, the home of SuperCorp's current headquarters. Moreover, Middleburg is a predominately urban area and according to an employee survey, SuperCorp has determined that its workers prefer to live in an area that is not urban. Finally, Corporateville has lower taxes than Middleburg, making it not only a safer place to work but also a cheaper one. Therefore, Supercorp clearly made the best decision.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on the assumptions and what the implications are if the assumptions prove unwarranted.

The argument concludes that the decision taken by Supercorp of moving its headquarters to Corporateville is the best decision, but the conclusion made is based on precarious facts. And there are many favorable assumptions considered, which if proven else will weaken this argument.

Foremost, the recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that people are interested in buying houses in Corporateville, not that it is a superior place to live than Middleburg. Instead, People might not be buying houses to live but buying them from an investment point of view.

Middleburg is a predominately urban area proves that Middleburg is an urban area but it does not state that Corporateville is also not an urban area. Then the survey that has determined that employees of SuperCorp prefer to live in an area that is not urban, if true, makes Corporateville decision to move its headquarters a bad one.
There is nothing mentioned about how many people or employees took part in the survey, for all we know out all the employees only two people might have taken part in it.

Corporateville has lower taxes than Middleburg does not prove that it is a safer and cheaper place to work. For all, the tax might be lower than Middleburg, but higher than all other cities. There is no evidence provided which proves that Corporateville is a safer place, lower taxes has no relation with the safety of that place.

In conclusion, the decision taken by Supercorp of moving its headquarters to Corporateville is the not the best decision, the conclusion is based on very weak arguments or facts.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-09-23 jaincharvi 50 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...favorable assumptions considered, which if proven else will weaken this argument. ...
^^
Line 6, column 104, Rule ID: CONFUSION_OF_OUR_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'our'?
Suggestion: our
...ook part in the survey, for all we know out all the employees only two people might...
^^^
Line 10, column 96, Rule ID: THE_EXACTLY_THE[1]
Message: Duplicated 'the' in the phrase: 'the not the'. Did you mean 'not the'?
Suggestion: not the
...g its headquarters to Corporateville is the not the best decision, the conclusion is based ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 55.5748502994 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 2260.96107784 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 270.0 441.139720559 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98148148148 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.56307096286 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01541763015 2.78398813304 108% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 204.123752495 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477777777778 0.468620217663 102% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 705.55239521 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0310323666 57.8364921388 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.272727273 119.503703932 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 23.324526521 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 5.70786347227 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354016682441 0.218282227539 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141454457944 0.0743258471296 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123060237201 0.0701772020484 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159859523714 0.128457276422 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761750891248 0.0628817314937 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 98.500998004 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.