An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition
The statement mainly contends that the patient should have easy access to the doctor's records who has been treating the patient and who has treated another similarly afflicted patients. This helps the patient to understand that whether the doctor is liable to treat him or not.
When the patient is able to access the records of the doctor he get a rough idea about how well the doctor is in treating similarly afflicted patients like him. This helps the patient to get known that he has not come to any wrong doctor for his treatment. As of today there many of the scandals caught of fake degrees of the doctor, so this will prevent the patient from getting trapped in such kind of fake doctors. As of sometimes there may also be possibility that the doctor may not be much expert in treating the disease the patient has got. So by checking the records of other patients, the patient can get come to know that whether the doctor is expert in treating the disease the patient has got or not.
Sometimes there are possibilities that the doctor may not be knowing much about disease and it may be a new case for the doctor, so by checking the records the patient can get come to know about how much patients the doctor has treated with such kind of disease. As sometimes the greedy doctors give the random treatment to the patient for money. So with the help of track records one can remain safe from such kind of doctors.
But there are also some other consequences to this as sometimes it may be possible that the patient's take the wrong advantage for their access to the doctor's track records by giving the information about the doctor to other doctors. Patient should have excess to some extent such that it does not hinder the self-respect of the doctors. Sometimes there are such kind of patients who keeps on telling that what the doctor should do or not do on the basis of track records which should be restricted. However positive effect of allowing the patient to watch the track records completely overcomes the above negative impacts.
In conclusion the patient should be allowed to watch the track records of the doctor but only of that patient who had the same kind of disease. As it will not hinder the privacy of the doctor and also does not allow the patient to do any kind of wrong thing. This will result in a fruitful effect both for doctors as well as patients as the patients can gain the knowledge about the record of the doctor and as if the doctor would be having good track record the patient will recommend to other patients about that doctor which will be beneficiary for the doctor.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Harshali_15 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | Masterji | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | sarahaduwa | 66 | view |
- The best test of an argument is the argument's ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint. 50
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. 50
- "The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority." 50
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues."Over the past year, the Crust Copper Company (CCC) has purchased over 10,000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia. Mining copper on this land wi 58
- "Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field." 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...octor is liable to treat him or not. When the patient is able to access the recor...
^^^^
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gets'.
Suggestion: gets
... to access the records of the doctor he get a rough idea about how well the doctor ...
^^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...g trapped in such kind of fake doctors. As of sometimes there may also be possibil...
^^
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...e possibilities that the doctor may not be knowing much about disease and it may be a new ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... patient can get come to know about how much patients the doctor has treated with su...
^^^^
Line 7, column 363, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'kinds'?
Suggestion: kinds
...f the doctors. Sometimes there are such kind of patients who keeps on telling that w...
^^^^
Line 9, column 315, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...t in a fruitful effect both for doctors as well as patients as the patients can gain the k...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, similarly, so, well, in conclusion, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2151.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 471.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56687898089 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.271039828 2.79657885939 81% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.343949044586 0.4932671777 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 647.1 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9561179677 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.529411765 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7058823529 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406075003525 0.243740707755 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177881540793 0.0831039109588 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917026899492 0.0758088955206 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298623845385 0.150359130593 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836123197085 0.0667264976115 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 48.8420337079 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.1639044944 78% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.