An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Doctors are a manifestation of God. They perform diagnosis, regular checkups and identify the presence of any diseases, detect their symptoms effectively and help with the cure. The given recommendation suggests that an ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients. By gaining such access, the ailing patient might be able to better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat the patient's malady or not. Hence, we further expatiate the pros and cons of obtaining such information.
The patient might receive the doctor's previous data on treating similar ailments. However, there is no guarantee that the patient is adequately qualified to understand the specific details and idiosyncrasies of a particular case. Moreover, not all patients diagnosed with similar symptoms have the same disease in equal extents. As bodies and their functioning varies form person to person, likewise the immunity and tolerance levels greatly differ, in turn having a profound impact on each person's health in a unique way. There is nothing ubiquitous when it comes to health and its study. This directly indicates that even after receiving such information, firstly we cannot guarantee that the patient will obtain full understanding of his/her malady, and second he/she cannot make apposite and pertinent assumptions of his/her treatment by the concerned doctor based on other patients' data.
In addition, each medical case has its own complexity and is tackled as suitable for the patient. This implies that the doctor's work cannot be judged based on his patient's records because each of them will have their own complications and therefore cannot be judged with the same yardstick. Also if the patient gathers such information then he/she may have presumptions about the treatment which might exacerbate the entire situation. A person who is not in the pink of his/ health should not be unnecessarily burdened about any matter which can result in things taking a turn for the worse. Hence, it does not make sense to share or reveal a doctor's records to the patient.
Nevertheless, on the positive end of the spectrum, knowing a doctor's treatment pattern and track record will only help boost the ailing patient's confidence that his/her health will ameliorate. It will also help the patient know the traits of a particular doctor, whether he has been successful in treating similar cases, or whether he gouges his patients or whether he is an infamous charlatan. Such knowledge of work ethics will prevent the patient from facing obstacles and insecurities in the later stage of treatment. It will also give the patient an opportunity to get aware about the treatment pattern and compare doctors before making a choice.
Let us consider a few examples to further bolster our opinion. If a doctor has been popular in his medical profession since time immemorial, and is renowned far and wide across the continents as the most skilled professional then any upcoming patient would feel secure that his/her health is in safe hands. Another instance is when a doctor has successfully established his position in treating similar cases and has the most positive feedback the again the patient would not think twice about consulting this particular doctor to treat his ailment. However, if some doctor has made a name in the industry by unscrupulous means and fleeces people of their money then knowing the doctor's records would help the patient avoid any future troubles by undergoing treatment with him in-charge.
Hence, as we can see there are several reasons and counter-arguments possible for the recommendation. Any decision must be made only after thorough revision of the medical laws and after consulting doctors regarding the matter. Surveys can also be conducted to gain an understanding of how the doctors or ailing patients would react to this recommendation. These surveys would delineate what the masses find agreeable and accordingly suggest the future plan of action.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Harshali_15 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | Masterji | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | sarahaduwa | 66 | view |
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 50
- "The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar."Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your 58
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 55
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 75
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.Write 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 453, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
...er the doctor is competent to treat the patients malady or not. Hence, we further expati...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...n turn having a profound impact on each persons health in a unique way. There is nothin...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a unique way" with adverb for "unique"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... profound impact on each persons health in a unique way. There is nothing ubiquitous when it co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 879, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
... by the concerned doctor based on other patients data. In addition, each medical case...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...nnot be judged with the same yardstick. Also if the patient gathers such information...
^^^^
Line 7, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
...positive end of the spectrum, knowing a doctors treatment pattern and track record will...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
... record will only help boost the ailing patients confidence that his/her health will ame...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 653, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...compare doctors before making a choice. Let us consider a few examples to furthe...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 445, Rule ID: THE_EXACTLY_THE[1]
Message: Duplicated 'the' in the phrase: 'the again the'. Did you mean 'again the'?
Suggestion: again the
...ases and has the most positive feedback the again the patient would not think twice about con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, likewise, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, second, similarly, so, then, therefore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3402.0 2235.4752809 152% => OK
No of words: 648.0 442.535393258 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.04537849152 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79132328348 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 318.0 215.323595506 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490740740741 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 1042.2 704.065955056 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3961586337 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453828992888 0.243740707755 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124207904201 0.0831039109588 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135197592024 0.0758088955206 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254212116105 0.150359130593 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138738515263 0.0667264976115 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 173.0 100.480337079 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.