In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
The author of the statement claim that in any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years because surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. While some may argue that this statement holds all the time, others may counter that claim by providing examples in support of their claim. In my essay, I will highlight both sides of the argument, and also provide sound reasoning for my claim.
First, If look at the private gaints like Microsoft, Apple, Reliance Industries, all of them are having or had single leader for many years and all of these organization are doing exceptionally well in their field, achieved various milestones under the single leadership. So I don't think so that after every 5 years those in power should step down from their position because with time your exprience will increased and help the leader in excel the orgination.
Secondly, If a organization keep on changing their top leadship, after every five year then this could create choas in the organiztion. Because every individual have their strategy for how the organization will work under their leardship and if the an organization keep on changing their leader after every five year then the organization way of working will change after every five year and this cloud be difficult for the employess as well as for the organization to adapt the new working model.
But as we know every coin has two side, the above prolonged leadership has too. This could have negative side too, beacuse if a President or a Prime Minister of a country will continue to run their government for long period of time, then they might have demolish the democracy and rule like a dictator. For example, Hitler withheld the position for decade and misused his power.
In nutshell, we can say that in some case those in power should step down after five years won't leads to success as mentioned in first two paragarph, but in some cases those in power should step down after five years. Thus, in my view,the surest path to success for any enterprise isn't revitalization through new leadership most of the time.
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 50
- Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students. 50
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority. 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problem, the ability of humans to thing about themselve will surely deteriorates. 50
- those who make the decision on the basis of their emotion and then justify them tend to be poor decision-maker. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... or had single leader for many years and all of these organization are doing exce...
^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this organization' or 'these organizations'?
Suggestion: this organization; these organizations
...ingle leader for many years and all of these organization are doing exceptionally well in their f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...tones under the single leadership. So I dont think so that after every 5 years those...
^^^^
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
...n because with time your exprience will increased and help the leader in excel the orgina...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n excel the orgination. Secondly, If a organization keep on changing their top...
^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'an' is left.
Suggestion: the; an
... will work under their leardship and if the an organization keep on changing their lea...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er every five year then the organization way of working will change after every f...
^^
Line 9, column 219, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ntinue to run their government for long period of time, then they might have demolish the demo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 256, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'demolished'.
Suggestion: demolished
...ng period of time, then they might have demolish the democracy and rule like a dictator....
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 235, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... down after five years. Thus, in my view,the surest path to success for any enterpri...
^^^^
Line 11, column 282, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...rest path to success for any enterprise isnt revitalization through new leadership m...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, while, as for, as to, for example, as well as, in my view, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 19.5258426966 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1923.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 388.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95618556701 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59414482309 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489690721649 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.3805437399 60.3974514979 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.923076923 118.986275619 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8461538462 23.4991977007 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1538461538 5.21951772744 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38910924402 0.243740707755 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178848745575 0.0831039109588 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.273377842903 0.0758088955206 361% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304982995916 0.150359130593 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.305044662985 0.0667264976115 457% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.