Major breakthroughs are more likely to spring from the minds of brilliant young people than seasoned experts are. The given thought is completely justified and history has been the witness of the same, be it Mero discovering electricity at 16 or Vitalik discovering bitcoin at 21. Most veterans suffer from the problem of redundantly thinking in their established thinking patterns often overlooking simple facts or being reluctant to explore new methods for solving old problems. Since, young blood is devoid of all such issues and ar full of energy and interest they are more likely to make greater contributions in any domain.
Firstly, most of experts are done with a significant part of their learning processes and have now established concepts and principles about their work. Hence, they are dogmatic and opinionated with their beliefs and work in particular direction irrespective of the circumstances because with years it has become a part of their identity. Moreover, they are not only reluctant to working with a new perspective, which is often required for any major breakthrough but are also reluctant to unorthodox ideas and practices. They seem to be not only arrogant with their experiences in their fields but also low on enthusiasm since their work now feels more mundane than ever. Theosis was a well-established physicist in the 20th century however, as he aged his breakthroughs not only became more fewer he also grew arrogant with his success, he was finally succeeded by one his students he deemed as heretic of physics who made even more significant contributions to physics.
Secondly, young blood often brings a sense of positive and high enthusiasm along with a new energy to work. They are more than ready to experiment and take risks that experienced experts are usually not ready to take. Additionally, they have not been through the major part of learning and can take up new ideas, bring a new line of thought to the field. Evidently, major breakthroughs have come from the mind of all these new people in their respective fields. Further, they are newer to the field and do not suffer from the same problem as of their seniors of finding their work uninteresting and are ready to work beyond the paycheck. As per the study conducted by fidelity it was reported that the average age of all new inventors and discoverers since last two centuries is 28 corroborating our claims.
Thirdly, it may be argued that older and more established experts have a better knowledge base and clearly stand a better chance of making new discoveries and to make significant contributions to their domains. However, it must be noted that science has little to do with your age it depends on experimental endeavors and your ability to defend your thesis based on those endeavors. Hence, contributions is irrespective of age , it may also very well be the case that one is gifted. It took Edison 10 years to make a simple light bulb ,while Kiwosaki, a 12 year old, made the LED in a couple of days in his spare time defying age and experience.
Finally, we can conclude that age and experience has little to do with one's ability to discover or invent. Young people are more inclined to outperform their superior's with their enthusiasm, energy, thought processes and ability to take risks. A new person might see what might seem impossible to an old eye with a different shade
- To be an effective leader a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address 62
- Claim When planning courses educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students Reason Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying Write a response in which you discuss the extent 50
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings 75
- The following appeared in a memo from a budget planner for the city of Grandview Our citizens are well aware of the fact that while the Grandview Symphony Orchestra was struggling to succeed our city government promised annual funding to help support it 73
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the experts') or simply say ''most experts''.
Suggestion: most of the experts; most experts
...ontributions in any domain. Firstly, most of experts are done with a significant part of the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: MAJOR_BREAKTHROUGH[1]
Message: Use simply 'breakthrough'.
Suggestion: breakthrough
...ective, which is often required for any major breakthrough but are also reluctant to unorthodox id...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 788, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'fewer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: fewer
... aged his breakthroughs not only became more fewer he also grew arrogant with his success,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 427, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ce, contributions is irrespective of age , it may also very well be the case that ...
^^
Line 7, column 535, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...son 10 years to make a simple light bulb ,while Kiwosaki, a 12 year old, made the ...
^^
Line 9, column 72, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ge and experience has little to do with ones ability to discover or invent. Young pe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2831.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 573.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94066317627 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89258810929 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82205713674 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492146596859 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 887.4 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6568491247 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.681818182 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0454545455 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68181818182 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161148628677 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05074171099 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654899795824 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943453274898 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523733896991 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.