In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Pioneers are the bringer of doom and boom, calamities, and salvation; they shape the route of the field and leave an unerasable mark on the path which shows the way for the rest of the people. The prompt maintains that the beginner or the initiator can contribute much better and make imperative breakthrough in any field of inquiry as compared to the experts. However, this may not hold water in every case; some instances may require an expertise's knowledge and skills to solve the cases, and the beginner may even cause more harm rather than making a significant contribution in the field.
To begin with, the beginners are not necessarily equipped with sufficient knowledge or skills to tackle a problem; this might render the beginner unable to proceed further in the case and contributing negligibly as compared to the experts who are trained and designated for those very tasks. For example, parents of kidnapped children try with their utmost might to find their loving children, but they are limited in required intelligence, skills, and equipments required to accomplish the task; the polices on the other hand, are the experts designated to solve the very cases which those parents could not solve initially. In such cases, despite acting as a beginner of the investigation, parents are not able to contribute significantly and require the assistance of experts (polices) to do the job. The above example illustrates that the beginners who are devoid of required skillset and knowledge of the cases they are inquiring, they are unable to make imperative contributions than the experts who are in fact well prepared for such tasks.
However, it would be blatantly wrong to discard the contribution made by the beginner in paving a path, and a way forward for the experts to work on. Indeed, the beginners set the road for the investigation, and inquiries; they identify the correct measures from hundreds of other available options which is of utmost importance in any field of inquiry. There is a saying, "the soldier to get the first bullet is the bravest"; the beginners are the heros who face the mistakes, confusions and leave a safe and right way to move; that's when the so called experts chime in to share the glory of the beginners. For intances, can we really announce that the greatest contribution was made by Hitler alone? What would he do without the soldiers to march forward for him? How would the nations fight for their motherland's glory without that brave soldiers to face the enemy in the front line? The beginners set a path for the experts to show their skills; without the soldiers to begin the march, there is no war, and no 'Glory for motherland' as well. Thus, it is evident that beginners can indeed play a significant role in a field of inquiry and make greater contribution than the experts.
To conclude, the beginner might play crucial roles and contribute imperatively depending on the context and they might not be as important in other cases. The prompt's assertion might hold water in certain cases only and it also depends largely on the individual skills of the beginner, and requirement of the field which requires a rigorous assessment of the field of inquiry.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-19 | Marqueetim | 43 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Dipesh1234 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | nigarsafarova | 75 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Bidusik47 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Sophy@ | 50 | view |
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 66
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 62
- Because people increasingly feel compelled to share their personal details online the right to privacy is eroding Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be 66
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Alta Manufacturing During the past year Alta Manufacturing had 30 percent more on the job accidents than nearby Panoply Industries where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours Experts belie 66
- Essay topics Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with s 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 440, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'expertises'' or 'expertise's'?
Suggestion: expertises'; expertise's
...ery case; some instances may require an expertises knowledge and skills to solve the cases...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 540, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...and leave a safe and right way to move; thats when the so called experts chime in to ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'prompts'' or 'prompt's'?
Suggestion: prompts'; prompt's
...not be as important in other cases. The prompts assertion might hold water in certain c...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, really, so, thus, well, for example, in fact, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2682.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 543.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93922651934 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73875798901 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453038674033 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 833.4 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.3355753986 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.764705882 118.986275619 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.9411764706 23.4991977007 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223966777054 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800693771663 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376300103459 0.0758088955206 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140575976411 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031878531928 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 14.1392134831 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 440, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'expertises'' or 'expertise's'?
Suggestion: expertises'; expertise's
...ery case; some instances may require an expertises knowledge and skills to solve the cases...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 540, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...and leave a safe and right way to move; thats when the so called experts chime in to ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'prompts'' or 'prompt's'?
Suggestion: prompts'; prompt's
...not be as important in other cases. The prompts assertion might hold water in certain c...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, really, so, thus, well, for example, in fact, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2682.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 543.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93922651934 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73875798901 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453038674033 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 833.4 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.3355753986 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.764705882 118.986275619 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.9411764706 23.4991977007 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223966777054 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800693771663 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376300103459 0.0758088955206 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140575976411 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031878531928 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 14.1392134831 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.