The speaker asserts, "the important discoveries in any field of inquiry are most likely made by the beginners, but not the experts". Firstly, some people might think that most of the beginners come with the ideas that are not contaminated by any other theories. Secondly, when we called somebody, "an expert", it means he/she has studied and rehearsed deeply about the given idea, they must have more knowledge and abilities than others. I concede that if a novice in a group would suggest a solution to a problem. It's wise to give him/her a chance. But, most of the achievements acquired by someone are done under the experts.
First and foremost, an expert has much experience which is a significant factor to the birth of great discoveries and inventions. As we know, a building could be constructed only on a strong base. Experts are the people who research in a specific area of discipline, they are aware of previous and current theories and data in trend, which can help them to achieve greatness in the field, they engaged in. Like a saying," the only source of knowledge is experience". A leader without experience can never lead his team. Newton, a great scientist, who made many discoveries in physics. He said, to achieve great achievements he would stand on the shoulder of a giant so he can see further. This a generalization of why experience is needed.
Although, "inexperience is the quality, allowing you to do impossible". A novice is often motivational and optimistic. This quality leads to success and new discoveries. The beginners are uploaded with new ideas, technologies, and services around the world. These characteristics are beneficial for an enterprise. Though, lack of experience hinders them to gain further progress. For example, in a start-up, the CEO will always first hire experienced persons, then choose beginners with a new and great idea. Experts are the ones who can show a path to beginners. Therefore, not only beginners but experts together make new discoveries.
To sum up, a beginner may not know a great idea or its potential. That's why it's good to have an expert or two in a room. If everyone is a beginner, then there are many ideas, most of them must be useless, one or two may be good, maybe one great. But who would know the difference? A room full of experts is just as bad. No one will agree to whose idea is perfect. So a mix of novel and experts may work out with new discoveries and inventions.
- The best way to learn a new subject or skill is to study small segments or details in great depth rather than to start by trying to develop a sense of the whole 50
- People work more productively in teams than individually Teamwork requires cooperation which motivates people much more than individual competition does 83
- in most societies competition generally has more of a negative effective effect than a positive effect 50
- The greatest of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them and not by their contemporaries 45
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 621, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...of the achievements acquired by someone are done under the experts. First and fo...
^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...he field, they engaged in. Like a saying,' the only source of knowledge is experi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...stics are beneficial for an enterprise. Though, lack of experience hinders them to gai...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...not know a great idea or its potential. Thats why its good to have an expert or two i...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...ne or two may be good, maybe one great. but who would know the difference? A room f...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2076.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 425.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88470588235 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07484852076 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548235294118 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7531545295 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.2 118.986275619 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.1666666667 23.4991977007 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.03333333333 5.21951772744 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143659098284 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312943232691 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340121088836 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0834383800165 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279852674839 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 14.1392134831 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.43 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 621, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...of the achievements acquired by someone are done under the experts. First and fo...
^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...he field, they engaged in. Like a saying,' the only source of knowledge is experi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...stics are beneficial for an enterprise. Though, lack of experience hinders them to gai...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...not know a great idea or its potential. Thats why its good to have an expert or two i...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...ne or two may be good, maybe one great. but who would know the difference? A room f...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2076.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 425.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88470588235 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07484852076 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548235294118 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7531545295 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.2 118.986275619 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.1666666667 23.4991977007 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.03333333333 5.21951772744 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143659098284 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312943232691 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340121088836 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0834383800165 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279852674839 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 14.1392134831 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.43 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.