The claim given here states that an argument is said to be best if it portrays convincing answer to the questions raised against it. I strongly agree with the claim as well as the reason provided by an author. In my view, an argument is what, which is based on some empirical facts and cannot be reproached by others with the corroborating statement.
The first reason for my belief is that the best argument is like a scientific theory which can be verified with logical reasoning. In fact, the conception of each and every theory is made by an argument. For example, if Sir Issac Newton didn't argue about falling mechanism of an apple down from the tree, the theory of gravitation would not be bourgeoned in the scientific community. First, he argued with himself, and he satiated himself with searching a logical reason, then after he modified his argument to make convince all curious fellow of his time. This example clearly illustrates that how a convincing argument can be a scientific theory.
The second reason for my belief is that an argument without best reason is like a wishful thinking of an arguer rather than a substantive statement. For instance, the president of the United States claimed that all the immigrant here in his country are the useless fellow of their own country, they should have to send back to their respective territory. But, the opponent gainsaid his claim by stating that the highest proportion of the high paid job positions are occupied by the immigrants.
Moreover, the alacrity of an argument is based on a satisfactory answer of skeptical questions raised by the erudite commentator. One without a convincing answer is like a hunch. We should have to aware that we cannot take satisfactory answer in every argument. Some argument is based on some ritual values where no one can get to the point answer to all questions.
In sum, the ability to convince to opposing viewpoints make an argument best. The opposing views, actually reveal the real value of the idea presented on the argument.
- Critical judgement of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 50
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 66
- In any given field, the leading voices come from people who are motivated not by conviction but by the desire to present opinions and ideas that differ from those held by the majority. 50
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure 50
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss the e 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ument. For example, if Sir Issac Newton didnt argue about falling mechanism of an app...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'without the best'.
Suggestion: without the best
...eason for my belief is that an argument without best reason is like a wishful thinking of an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in fact, as well as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 348.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87356321839 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69186469811 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505747126437 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0094733096 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7647058824 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4705882353 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348684480304 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121967494819 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853408189147 0.0758088955206 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215760131189 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101629348819 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.