There is a claim in the United States that the online blogosphere and the social media has exacerbated the quality of political discourse, as nowadays anyone can publish political opinions easily, in spite of the protocols issued for covering the news and political issues. I completely agree over the claim because we are in to the so called technological era where people are being manipulated by the fake conspiracy theories.
Internet has a plethora of options to sandwich apocryphal messages. There are no restrictions by the users to form community and news channels on their own. Neither there is a license being issued for a normal citizen nor the content is being under censor before publishing a fake news. Indeed, this has drastically affected the accuracy of the actual news that had happened. Perhaps, false information and news spread rapidly like a domino effect that it instils a fire of hatred worldwide.
It has never stopped affecting the political discourse in the US. For instance, the Pizzagate hashtag was trending so much that the democrats were being abused about fake pedophile prevailing in a particular region. Consequently, people were protesting for no reason and even performed illicit demonstrations that resulted in imprisoning them.
Not only in the US, such trends are happening in nooks and corner of the world. People capable of manipulating the minds of others are becoming more vulnerable to the society in which we live. The most affected age groups being the teens and the youths of the world, who fails to reason the authenticity of each blogs or news they come across. In fact, social media is misused by the terrorists who infiltrate a country, gather acquaintances, spread false news, and try to rule out the government. Social media is a check mate to humanity.
Apparently, as mentioned in the prompt, such detrimental activities affects the standards of the news and the actual political agenda. The reason is based on the facts discussed above and it is quite obvious that internet can be misused nowadays in a way that conspiracy theories are sharper than swords.
- Ielts Cambridge book 7 test 2 writing task 1 55
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 83
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend quot Of the two leading real estate firms in our town Adams Realty and FitchRealty Adams Realty is clearly superior Adams has 40 real estate agents incontrast Fitch has 25 many of wh 50
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor s record of treating similarly afflicted patients Through gaining such access the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition 66
- we are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology How do you think it will change in the future is it good for us to reply so much on computers 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 274, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'fake news'.
Suggestion: fake news
...is being under censor before publishing a fake news. Indeed, this has drastically affected ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, consequently, so, then, for instance, in fact, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 349.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06876790831 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82602846641 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570200573066 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9330817755 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.058823529 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11764705882 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324757998903 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838888050007 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138208898364 0.0758088955206 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171585544641 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145554316052 0.0667264976115 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.