Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.
Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish.
The above claim is based on a logical conclusion, as a person should also understand the potential of the dreams, the environment in which he lives. Dreaming to become something is one thing but analyzing and executing it is major part.
Firstly, the location and the type of exposure an individual gets matters a lot as no matter how good you are at basketball but if you live in India you are never going to play in NBA, reason being India has not developed that sport and a single player does not make the entire sport better for the nation. Therefore, right environment matters and it will definitely make a difference.
Secondly, the career path should be based on dreams and logic you need to keep both the things in mind and not just run after one. for example thinking to become the Prime Minister of a nation is a dream to achieve this you need to focus on logic you need to understand the steps that you require to reach the end point like join a party, become the head of a province and then become the head of the nation, using this process you will be able to get the concept and understand the flaws and the chances to achieve the dream.
The people who oppose the above statement are going to say that the dreams gives us energy to work to our fullest and anything is possible with motivation. Their thinking is correct to some extent as you can reach the top point in you career where any hardworking candidate and go but after that point you need to change the surrounding like company or country because you are giving 100 percent input and not getting 100 percent results.
In a nutshell, we need to understand that analyzing things is equally important as mostly people choose wrong goals and waste their entire life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-03 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Adesina Boluwatito | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-03 | shamika@25 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-03 | shamika@25 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-17 | RIYA MODI | 50 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
- Fifteen years ago Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors Since that time Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes and overall student 65
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance 50
- Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia Using an observation centered approach to studying Tertian culture he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by the 30
- The best way for Society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them sense of cooperation and not competition 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ngs in mind and not just run after one. for example thinking to become the Prime Mi...
^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reaching'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: reaching
...o understand the steps that you require to reach the end point like join a party, become...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 105, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to wrong'
Suggestion: to wrong
...ually important as mostly people choose wrong goals and waste their entire life.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 316.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53797468354 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36198088335 2.79657885939 84% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541139240506 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 23.0359550562 152% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.160069794 60.3974514979 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.333333333 118.986275619 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.1111111111 23.4991977007 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.21951772744 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107224710083 0.243740707755 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523109154023 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348494559303 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0626451306307 0.150359130593 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236895023851 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 12.1639044944 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 100.480337079 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 11.2143820225 143% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.