Enactment of law to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state is one of the main areas of contention. As, the conservationist advocate for the preservation of wilderness, on the other side, economist are penchant towards the economic growth. Wilderness areas are the natural habitat of flora and fauna. Preservation of this area is the nation’s responsibility. I contend that the nation should pass laws to preserve the remaining wilderness area.
Encroachment of wilderness areas for development has destroyed the natural habitat of many animals, consequently, has led to the extinction of animals. Every animal entails a specific climatic condition and environment to survive, and if it is destroyed of modified it is difficult for that animal to survive, which indeed leads to imperilment of the animal.
Usually, when animals are shifted to another location, they do not survive, as not only the area but also the climate should be suitable for the animal. For instance, if a polar bear is shifted from Artic Circle to Africa or any other place for instance which does not have a cold climate like Artic Circle, it is highly unlikely that the polar bear will survive, regardless that bear is well fed and taken care of. In the last hundred years, we have seen a plummet in the diversity of flora and fauna, all due to development. For instance, West Bengal, a city in India, was famous for the legion of white "Bengal tigers", but in the recent years, there has been a drastic downfall in their numbers.
Destruction of wilderness not only leads to plummeting of the diversity of animals but also has been the major cause for the change in climate. Indeed, global warming is the best example, due to the extensive cut down of trees for economic development, the temperature of the surrounding has risen. Many of the flora have dwelled down as the climate is not suitable for their growth. Many of the rare plants, which were previously present in the surrounding are now only found in the botanical gardens. Global warming is the major reason which has led to their extinction.
Many things should be considered before preserving an area like, at what cost are we preserving an area. How greatly can the development of the area affect the economic growth, consequently, what are the repercussions of developing or preserving the area? Consequently, if nations passed laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, the remaining flora and fauna will be preserved, but it might thwart the economic grown of the nations.
Protection and preservation of wilderness areas is an important issue as the damage cause is somewhat irreversible. Enactment of laws will only lead to a better natural environment, not only for flora and fauna but also for humans and their posterity.
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 29
- productivity and rewards 66
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 50
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 50
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible. Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time. Which of these situations do you think is better? 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 711, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en a drastic downfall in their numbers. Destruction of wilderness not only leads...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, well, as for, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2381.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 470.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06595744681 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92558143092 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451063829787 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 757.8 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.740449438202 405% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0472339254 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.380952381 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.380952381 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.80952380952 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0973278155321 0.243740707755 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386069422825 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424321751896 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0518597567216 0.150359130593 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028364963017 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.