Claim: No act is done purely for the benefit of others.
Reason: All actions — even those that seem to be done for other people — are based on self-interest.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
It is a well renowned claim that, no act is done purely for the benefit of others. All actions- even the one which seems to be done for betterment of other has some underlying personal benifical motive of self-intertest, and I would quiet agree with the claim. The assertiveness of the claim is based on various reasons, some of which will I will detail-out further.
To begain with, one of the most promient example which I can think off is the activities taken by CSR-Corporate Social Responsibity taken up by various industries of corporate sector. By defenation, CSR activities should be taken by industries to help socitiey flourish which has help them in direct or indirect ways. Though there have been many rules and regulations to make sure that the CSR activities should benifit other people and not the company itself. Yet, the corporate involved in the busniess have found out many ways to make the CSR activities benifical to them in intangiable ways. For example, CSR helps corporate in marketing their product or service, helps in building goodwill of a company etc.. This is one of the reason, more and more companies are willingly ready to work in CSR as they have intangible benifits to explore.
Moreover, it’s not only the corporate sector reaping out fruit of benefits in name of social services. Even the politics and politican works in similar fashion. With myriad of developement schemes coming up for meager and downtrodden section of the society, not all come with all in good faith. There have been many instances- where a development scheme gets started to help politicans in creating a viable vote bank for them in the upcoming elections. Similarly, there have been instance where help is given to the needy by politican to form a good image of themselves in front of the citizen of the country.
Nonetheless, not all people help other to seek benefits in return of that favour. We all are aware of humans like Mother Teresa etc. who devoted their entire life to help others who need help.
In the end, I would like to conclude with the notion that, there are variety of people in the world. We can find people who selflessly devote their life to help others. These are gem of a person and are quiet difficult to find. In today’s world- the act of compassion is usually accomplished with some or the other self-interest.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | Moustafa Noufale | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | Moustafa Noufale | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | meghanajilla | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | Rituzzzz | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | robrt97 | 50 | view |
- - 3
- The best way to teach — whether as an educator, employer, or parent — is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting y 50
- Alturism 3
- Claim Though often considered an objective pursuit learning about the historical past requires creativity Reason Because we can never know the past directly we must reconstruct it by imaginatively interpreting historical accounts documents and artifacts W 91
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: THINK_OFF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'of'?
Suggestion: of
...most promient example which I can think off is the activities taken by CSR-Corporat...
^^^
Line 3, column 712, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ps in building goodwill of a company etc.. This is one of the reason, more and mor...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, nonetheless, similarly, so, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 406.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83990147783 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70323647542 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509852216749 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3764320547 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5714285714 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.80952380952 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266844200495 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780677211653 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999842677751 0.0758088955206 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161807693125 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154357094545 0.0667264976115 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.