Author claims that scrutinization and judgement of work irrespective of field only has value if it comes from someone who is virtuoso in that field. I would agree with the author claim because in order to peruse and give judgement based on someone work, should be done by an expert.
Whenever a person is assigned a particular task, the individual will try to finish the work while making sure that the work is not errorneous and the person also makes sure that the work is not bungled. Anyhow, in any field, there is always a procedure followed where if an individual completes a task assigned to them, is scrutnized by someone from their team. The process of judging the work is pivotal because it helps in, if any, identification of mistakes in work. Identifying the mistakes and correcting it can be done by the experts only because they have much more experience than the individual who has performed the task and would be able to identify the mistake. For example, if we consider a software company, which uses Agile Methodology for the development of a software, has a cyclic process where an individual will perform a particular development task and the architect of the software will scrutinze the task and if any, would suggest improvement in the code written by a group member. It is of upmost important that the critical judgment of a work is passed by a virtuoso because if there is any logical fallacies in the code, they will be able to identify it. But, if the same task of scrutnizing and passing critical judgementis assigned to an apprentice, the person will not be able to judge the work as they do not have any expertise on writing the code itself let alone judging someone else's work. So, in a software company if a code is written by an individual, then it should always be scrutinized by someone who has more expertise.
Although it is judicious to get critical judgement of work in any given field by a veteran, it is also wise to let a person who is a novice in field to browse through the work. This helps because allowing a work to be reviewed by fresh set of eyes might be able to give out judgement in such a manner that it might not have been suggested by an expert. For example, in an Information Technology company, there are apprentices in every projects, who learn from the experts and apply their knowledge on an assigned task. Experts when judge someone's work, they follow the same set of rules they have done through out their past years of experience. It is a mundane task for them and sometime they don't think out of the box and it would mean there is a shortfall in the creativity of the company. Although the freshman might not have enough knowledge to judge someone's work, but if allowed, they could look over the work and give a creative advice to resolve a problem. This helps in improving creativity of the company and should be taken as a positive approach in improving the quality of the work.
I would agree with the author claim that the critical judgment of a work should be passed by someone who is expert in their field but an apprentice should also be allowed to scrutinze the work. As by allowing it, even a non-expert could be able to suggest a solution, if better, could be used to improve the quality of the work.
- According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies act 39
- "The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition." - Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or dis 66
- The turing test- Barron's(integrated essay) 70
- The college years are the best time in person's life. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons to support your opinion. 60
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals. Altruism is the opposite of selfishness; individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves.Examples of altruism 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 603, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...ow the same set of rules they have done through out their past years of experience. It is a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 695, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...mundane task for them and sometime they dont think out of the box and it would mean ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 927, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'creative advice'.
Suggestion: creative advice
... they could look over the work and give a creative advice to resolve a problem. This helps in imp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, then, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2425.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 527.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60151802657 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63694448755 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.406072106262 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 792.9 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.8972096638 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.647058824 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 23.4991977007 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88235294118 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3293962862 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120758369681 0.0831039109588 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102492973155 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26560869394 0.150359130593 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055343732011 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.