Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs

Essay topics:

Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs.

gg

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-30 rahatumar9072 51 view
2023-11-01 qwertyy 50 view
2023-08-20 Ruhani 66 view
2023-08-20 Ruhani 66 view
2023-08-20 Ruhani 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user harvey_elliot :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... that when that happens, people tend to loose their cool. It is a general perception ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'Tesla' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'teslas'.
Suggestion: Teslas
... two famous physicist Edison and Nikola Tesla debated in the university of Zurich abo...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 290, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... to discuss anything controversial with these kind of people. But as the famous lyricist J...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, so, still, then, well, at least, kind of, as a result, in most cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2514.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 489.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14110429448 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80783872947 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476482617587 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 779.4 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.1646080227 60.3974514979 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.315789474 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7368421053 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05263157895 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.511495650693 0.243740707755 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157354793162 0.0831039109588 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161623154578 0.0758088955206 213% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289545222319 0.150359130593 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181736613025 0.0667264976115 272% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.