Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Educational institutions are places where people develop their character, groom themselves in a way to evolve into successful persons and good human beings. Every student studying in an educational institute has an equal right to choose whatever is the best stream in which he/she is intrested in to build a future in that particular work. However, in author's view the educational institutes must dissuade students from pursuing the fields of study in which they are not likely to gain success.Although, I do not comply with the authors argument completely.
In my view, nowadays, the evolving nature of science and advancements in technology open a new door of a field of study each and every day. The fields of study for a student to choose from for one's future are far more greater than in the previous times. No field of study, now has a limited scope or diminished path to achieve success. A student having a keen intrest in studying a particular subject or field of study, must be given equal importance and encouragement to move forward in his path. In fact, rather than opposing or preventing students to take up a particular field of study, the educational institutes must motivate the students to explore new fields of study and pursue what the students are really intrested in.
For instance, in India back in time, every parent and teacher always wanted a student who has cleared high school to take up science and pursue engineering or medical in future. This attitude back then never allowed a student to think about or go about in a field which he/she dreamt or was interested in. With undue pressure from one's parents and teachers, one had to take up either of the above two. Similarly, for this prompt, educational institutes must not force a student to take up a particular field of study without consulting the student about one's intrests and passion.
We have some great examples all through the history who have achieved some extraordinary things which none of us could have imagined, especially not the institutions where they studied. We all know Apple’s founder Steve Jobs. He did not have it all planned out, after the first year in college he dropped out, with no particular passion to go for. Later to earn money, he came with a plan and teamed up with Steve Wozniak to build an integrated computer that people will end up loving, and gradually created today’s Apple. Had his professors discouraged him by telling that he should not go for building computers as he will be unlikely to succeed, we would not have the Apple we know today.
In conclusion the decision to choose a field of study must be left to the individual itself. The educational institutes must in fact, bolster the students and correct their way if they go wrong somewhere but not discourage them by saying that they will not succeed in what they do.
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 83
- Reading paper materials is better than watching electronic devices to gain information 73
- These days if you pick up a newspaper or turn on the TV or radio you may hear or read about the advantages of driverless cars also called self driving or autonomous cars The technology is simple to understand using sensors and computers these cars can dri 73
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildl 60
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 495, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Although
...ich they are not likely to gain success.Although, I do not comply with the authors argum...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 495, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ich they are not likely to gain success.Although, I do not comply with the authors argum...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 530, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...cess.Although, I do not comply with the authors argument completely. In my view, now...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... study for a student to choose from for ones future are far more greater than in the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'greater' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: greater
... to choose from for ones future are far more greater than in the previous times. No field of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 623, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f study, the educational institutes must motivate the students to explore new fie...
^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ience and pursue engineering or medical in future. This attitude back then never allowed ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...interested in. With undue pressure from ones parents and teachers, one had to take u...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, really, similarly, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2374.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 491.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8350305499 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69004300291 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501018329939 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 744.3 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8175201726 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.947368421 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8421052632 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416041269516 0.243740707755 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119813792811 0.0831039109588 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941364444862 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233905835184 0.150359130593 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786900831425 0.0667264976115 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.