Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Electing field in secondary school and university has always been in hot debate among students, parents, teachers and experts. While some claim students should select a field that could find job in the future, others maintain students' interests are more important for success of students in their future careers and satisfaction of their jobs. Although the reasons of both groups look cogent at the first glance, I reckon considering interest is more important and could lead student to success.
The statement mentions educational institutes should guide students to the fields that assure their success and try to protect them from failure. In the reality, recognizing and predicting that which field would lead to success for a particular student is not possible. Some may think a deaf person would not be successful in the music and writing song, but we can name Beethoven with stunning plays in the history of music with his deficiency in the hearing. Thus, hard working in insist in the goal could lead to success, even other think differently. Therefore, institutes and organizations just could consult with student but they could not assure their success.
In addition, some assert job market should be considered in choosing fields. They believe the final goal of education is finding a job and earning money. However, if student just worry about their future jobs without recognizing their interest may lead to wasting time and disappointing. Given a student that follows Mechanical engineering because he thinks he could find a good job and adequate salary. He spends 4 years in the university and after graduation find out his real interest is art. It means he waste four years in university whereas he could learn the art that he likes. Even if he pursues Mechanical engineering and gets a job, he would rarely likely to be successful or doing an excellent job, besides, he would not satisfy with his job.
On the other hand, some may claim that talent of a student play critical role in choosing field for education. They say organizations should find talents of students in different fields and accordingly students should choose the fields that have talents. Although their idea looks interesting at first, I do not believe to the talent. I think everything is attainable with hard-working. What I mean is that if students choose the fields that they like they would work harder on that field and consequently they gain appropriate skills.
In conclusion, although institutes could consult students in choosing appropriate fields in their education, I reckon they should not restrict students to the specific fields. In the other word, students can consult with the others like consultant, teacher and experts but finally they should decide according their interests.
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 66
- The following appeared in a health magazine published in Corpora Medical experts say that only one quarter of Corpora s citizens meet the current standards for adequate physical fitness even though twenty years ago one half of all of Corpora s citizens me 66
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 61
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting yo 50
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In de 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 279, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
...cular student is not possible. Some may think a deaf person would not be successful i...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 91, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
... student play critical role in choosing field for education. They say organizations s...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to appropriate'
Suggestion: to appropriate
...utes could consult students in choosing appropriate fields in their education, I reckon the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, i mean, i reckon, i think, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2337.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15894039735 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69392020445 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485651214128 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3299408905 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.227272727 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5909090909 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.21951772744 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155236090462 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553611471224 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525435127803 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104319079108 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394480342748 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.