Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Education plays a very fundamental but basic role in today’s society, education institutions, therefore, play a tantamount role. The prompt suggests that the institutions should persuade students from not pursuing fields of study that they are less or unlikely not going to succeed. In my opinion, I mostly disagree with this and would argue that institutions must not dissuade students for the following reasons.
First, dissuading someone from not choosing a field might not technically be coercion but it intrinsically or implicitly is. Most students who are joining universities are ambiguous about their field, for such students it might be helpful, but for students who choose a field of study based on passion, this policy would be unscrupulous. Many things can come into play to ironically capsize the student into the wrong field, like personal prejudice, lack of complete knowledge/ potential about the fields existing. For instance, a student who dreams to take up hotel management, a council officer who is a connoisseur or has an insight into the technical field might unconsciously dissuade him from taking up hotel management and move into the technical fields like information technology, computer science as IT sectors have a lot of potentials. This can turn out the way where the student is very passionate and might be successful in the field of his interest.
Second, some students who are not obdurate about their field of interest of study, who can be convinced into taking up something else might graduate and get a job, but will he fondness in what he is doing? Will he be able to work his potential without feeling stressed? Will he find gratification or satisfaction, to say the least? Contrastingly, when a student graduates from a field that he would love to work for, might enjoy his work and be very effective without feeling pressured.
The institution must, therefore, only try to counsel a student, lay out the facts and let him decide. The committee appointed can inform the student how to pursue secondary, elective or other fields as a passive source of income so that the student would have some sort of security even if he doesn’t succeed in the field he chose.
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I 50
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 75
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 50
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 50
- The pie charts illustrate the proportion of sodium saturated fats and added sugars in four types of meals in the USA 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, therefore, for instance, sort of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 365.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07671232877 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87200397468 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542465753425 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.1139623804 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.357142857 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0714285714 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19901594674 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788892867497 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683140468351 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134789401685 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622858133839 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.