Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
There are various goals for educational institutions, and they teach students with various approaches. Some people say that the institutions need to discourage students to study what they cannot learn well for efficiency and effectiveness. However, I do not agree with the opinion. I insist that educational institutions should not dissuade their students to study a certain field due to the low possibility to succeed in the field.
Firstly, estimating students’ abilities is not easy work. Especially, schools use confined ways to evaluate a large number of students – such as exams, and the evaluation systems are never perfect. Sometimes they wrongly evaluate their students due to unreasonable evaluating criteria or students’ abrupt bad body conditions. If teachers judge their students with exam scores and prevent them from studying a field where students could not get a high score, students may lose their chances to find their possibly undiscovered talents in the field. Thus, as educational institutions may fail to properly estimate their students, discouraging the students to study a field with a low possibility of success in the field is not a good idea.
Secondly, strong interests in a field can lead students to succeed in the field. For example, there might be a student who is not good at science during his junior year. However, all of sudden, he may face a moment that stimulates him to study science. Then, he will put a lot of time and effort to study the field, and it may lead him to be able to succeed in the field. If schools dissuaded him to study science due to the not outstanding score during his junior year, he would never have chance of success. As students can change the possibility to succeed in a field through their efforts, I insist that schools should not dissuade them to study a field with their current abilities.
For those who set the utmost goal of teaching to lead students to find a study field that they are most likely to be successful in, they may agree with the given prompt. However, as it is difficult to evaluate students’ abilities and they can improve their abilities with their will, I would like to say that it is not desirable for educational institutions to dissuade students to study a field due to the low possibility to succeed in the field.
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 70
- People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellow students or co workers than from those at a higher level such as teachers or supervisors 70
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 50
- In an attempt to improve highway safety Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways But this effort has failed the number of accidents has not decreased and based on reports by the highway patrol man 70
- The following appeared in a letter to the school board in the town of Centerville All students should be required to take the driver s education course at Centerville High School In the past two years several accidents in and around Centerville have invol 70
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 7 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 392 350
No. of Characters: 1874 1500
No. of Different Words: 164 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.45 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.781 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.691 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 124 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 102 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 69 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.059 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.361 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.765 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.4 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.4 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.183 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5