Education is essential for everybody. However, an argument arose whether student's penchant should be taken into account by tutor when making courses. Student's involvement may be conducive to their study, however, the method, because of student's singularity and focusing in specific subject, may arise various problem.
It is obvious that people interested in certain task will be actively involved if that given task is allocated to them; if the student, thus, is consulted while making a course content of the study, student performance is enhanced. However, while it appears beneficial for students, such practices are impractical.
Students' penchants are not consonance with the desired output of the mentoring. A student who is graduating in pharmaceutical sciences, for instance, may have strong fixation for pharmaceutical drug design course, while may be reluctant about studying chemistry or pharmacology. In such case, if students are allowed to choose courses for them, subjects among the courses would be distributed disproportionately. Since in this profession, the knowledge of other subject-chemistry, pharmacology- is as essential as any individual subject, such courses provide inept pharmacist for the society. Similarly, for any courses, commensurate focus is required for every essential subject to make qualified individual. Furthermore, as a mentor have already undergone through many experience regarding the requirement of, knowledge should be possessed by alumni, they can meet the curriculum according to need of society.
Every student has their own distinct desire, and such diverse desires among student impedes for incorporating students view while making courses. In particular, each student wants their desire subjects to be focused highly in curriculum. Consequently, there would be enormous burden for students to be engaged in curriculum which includes all students will. Neither curriculum should be focused on only few students, for it encourages partiality, nor a university will be able to provide individual curriculum to each student based on their disposition. Thus, it would be unfeasible to both preceptor and student to allow practice of heeding students view.
In conclusion, it would be impractical to include student desire while making courses due to above reasons. Therefore, Teacher should least, if not at all, account of student prepossession during curriculum making.
- TPO-46 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and exam 66
- TPO-01 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reaso 73
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 80
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 767, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun experience seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much experience', 'a good deal of experience'.
Suggestion: much experience; a good deal of experience
...a mentor have already undergone through many experience regarding the requirement of, knowledge...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, similarly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2076.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 359.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78272980501 5.05705443957 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16154148204 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571030640669 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.3010995634 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9444444444 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.21951772744 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162092612323 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644296009331 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028399025232 0.0758088955206 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103018056647 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122386171821 0.0667264976115 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 48.8420337079 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.1639044944 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.