Essay topics: The first step to self-knowledge is the rejection of the familiar.
Self-knowledge comes with self-realization or discovering oneself. The knowledge itself helps us to critical thinking and self-realization cannot be achieved until we question everything, critical to every belief. In order to introspect ourselves, we have to reject our inner belief and decoded every familial thinking. The more intense discovering self-knowledge, more we critically examine the antiquated beliefs.
First of all, familial beliefs hinder new discoveries and people get comfortable in their position. and someone quoted that ignorance is bliss. In order to reject the familial beliefs, we have to be self-sufficient and without proper knowledge or understanding, we can not refute the old beliefs. Persons have to learn to swim if he decided to swim opposite the stream. There are many families or beliefs which are amalgamated with our society. Without proper question and knowledge, we can not be an iconoclast. Every social reformer was used to break usual beliefs, from Galileo to Mark Zuckerberg, they reject familial beliefs for self-realization. Galileo reform the thinking towards the solar system and Mark Zuckerberg revolutionized the social platform. Another point is we have to go beyond the comfort zone of ours and rejects the familial and we might realize a bigger outer society. For example, if someone living in a metropolitan city, if he stops being stereotyped he can realize a diverse culture and adopted to another society.
Another aspect is, people can argue that we do not need to always reject our familial beliefs. We can learn from our old beliefs and built our new discoveries over them, even old beliefs which might be a failure might guide us. But without being self-sufficient and critical thinking we cannot achieve true self-knowledge.
At the epilogue of this topic, I would say that we need to rejects and question familial beliefs for self-knowledge and dives into ourselves. Every day we different from the past, we know the past life and question the present and work towards to build future
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-15 | Omar Ibna Nazim | 16 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | TiOluwani97 | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | PranaviN | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-03 | limbutimbu | 50 | view |
| 2022-05-20 | Anjal2115 | 50 | view |
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure 58
- Issue: the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals. 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 50
- Essay topics: The regional brand manager sent the following memo to the national brand manager for Sun-Beem Facial Cleanser.“We need to institute a huge publicity campaign for the launch of Sun-Beem’s improved formula. Without an enormous media blitz, 50
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...ople get comfortable in their position. and someone quoted that ignorance is bliss....
^^^
Line 4, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...present and work towards to build future
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 326.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29141104294 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09054674248 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518404907975 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6350379053 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.7894736842 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1578947368 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36842105263 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139699429096 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538529912074 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594706094023 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10329242723 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340087122541 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.