Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.
It is the sole responsibility of every individual in the society to obey laws, they are designed for the good of it. At times these laws are not beneficial for the society, instead could be detrimental to it and sometimes to an individual's dignity and pride.
People in Germany are known all over the world for strictly obeying the rules and regulations, they think it as their responsibility to obey them. Because of this habit of obeying the laws and strictly following the rules, they are successful in controlling the spread of COVID-19 pandemic, with the least number of deaths as compared to other countries. Thus, it is the responsibility of each and every individual to obey the rules to make society function better.
Likewise, there are many other examples of how following the rules and obeying the laws lead to better functioning of society. But sometimes these laws also inhibit the needs of people and cause them to protest against such unjust laws. For instance in India, the Supreme court took a very good decision of closing all the beer and wine shops on expressways. This decision of the court led to a huge loss of the government revenues, which they stopped getting after all those shops were closed. Also, this made the Restaurant and shop owners starve to death, who had it as the only source of income. From this, one can understand that there are not only good but also bad effects of some laws. Thus, resisting such laws by protesting against them to make the authorities to rethink and modify, is a good option.
As said, to protest against unjust laws is okay. But it is not at all acceptable if one disobeys the laws, as they are meant for the well-being of the society. Even though a law seems to be unjust for one, but as said before, there are both good and bad sides of it. It is the individual's view of how he looks at them. Every country gives its citizens the freedom of speech and expression, thus they could protest against the unjust laws by not actually disobeying them. Hence, disobeying and resisting the unjust laws is not at all agreeable, as there is an alternative option present of protesting against them.
In conclusion, every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws, and for the unjust ones instead of disobeying they could follow the approach as presented. As it is an individual’s level of perception from which he understands and not everyone thinks in the same way. Thus, one must follow all the rules whether it be just or unjust.
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and reason on which that claim is based Claim The best way to understand the character of society is to examine the character of the men and women that the soci 50
- The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College a private institution to the college s governing committee We recommend that Grove College preserve its century old tradition of all female education rather t 58
- The following appeared in a memo from the Vice President of the food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities Recently we signed a contract with Fly away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our warehouse in 58
- Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument The following appeared in a memo from the owner of a chain of cheese stores located throug 66
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reasons and or examples that could be used to challenge your position Critical 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...e detrimental to it and sometimes to an individuals dignity and pride. People in Germany a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... rules to make society function better. Likewise, there are many other examples ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, if, likewise, look, so, thus, well, after all, for instance, in conclusion, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2075.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 442.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69457013575 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65489905165 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450226244344 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4554211665 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8095238095 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0476190476 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402557186673 0.243740707755 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124423731965 0.0831039109588 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0970764610454 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242049075885 0.150359130593 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603403231992 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.