Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Governments of several nations of the world strive hard on a daily basis to provide solutions for the problems the citizens of a country are facing. People are of the opinion that the governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. The statement may prove to be true, if we roll back fifty years, when the world was not going through unprecedented problems like climate change, depleting natural resources and increasing poverty. Perhaps, for the current world scenario, it is ideal for the governments to find solutions for probable future problems and I support such a stance. I will explain the reasoning behind my position in the paragraphs below.
The world is going through undesirable changes when it comes to the overall climate. The temperatures of the world are rising and there is no solution currently to disuade the world temperatures from rising beyond the danger mark. Therefore, it is the responsibility of various governments of the world to look for a possible solution that might prevent global warming from becoming a world-ending event. Currently, global warming and climate change are only showing sporadic signs of existence, but if due attention is not paid towards this dangerous phenomena that is occuring. It could prove to be detrimental for human species. As a result, multinational companies like Amazon, Microsoft and Google have pledged towards going carbon-neutral in a few years. Such steps can be taken by government in advance to prevent a disaster from taking place.
Fossil fuels have been found in abundant quantities in various parts of the world. As a result, humans have paid no heed towards conserving these resources for the future generations. It is known that we humans are a selfish organism. We have grown so self-centered that we are exploiting fossil fuels as if we are the only ones that require it. Therefore, the world governments should look towards promoting alternative forms of energy, since that day would not be distant when we are left with no natural resources to consume. A long term plan has to be put in place. Like making policies so as to reduce the cost associated with investing in solar power, wind power and hydro power. These initiatives are necessary for the existence of human race in future. And the planning for such solutions should be started right away.
Lastly, the world today has many individuals who are below the poverty line. These people do not have the money to spend upon nutritious food items. As a result, the kids are born with deficiencies which cripple their normal functioning. It can be argued that these individuals can be provided food in the form donations, since poverty is a problem the world is facing right now. But donations are a short term solution. Therefore, allowing the governments to research upon new and cheaper ways to produce food would go about a long way in ascertaining the fact that poverty could be non-existent, fifty years down the line.
In sum, I am still a supporter of the claim that governments should concentrate upon trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. This is because the world is in a volatile state and if necessary actions are not taken to secure the future. We may be left with no future to look forward at all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-11 | guozhishan | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | sami18 | 79 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | shekhar | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 50 | view |
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and support 58
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 66
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 66
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement a 66
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 592, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...o be put in place. Like making policies so as to reduce the cost associated with investi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 751, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...cessary for the existence of human race in future. And the planning for such solutions sh...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, look, may, so, still, therefore, as to, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2803.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 566.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95229681979 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87757670434 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7701788609 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478798586572 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 873.9 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.2363279421 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4333333333 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.26666666667 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172154406171 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451128082059 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937897839613 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110937790653 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910217663693 0.0667264976115 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.