Government serve people. Government should shoulder responsibilities of tackling issues people want governments to address. Some problems are so urgent, but some are anticipated and awaited. Certainly, governments should prioritize to cope with the urgent issues, at the same time, some anticipated problems, although it is not hurried to be solved, still should be lied in the line of important agendas.
To begin with, governments should give the first thoughts in addressing urgent or immediate problems. If these issues have been solved, social stability will be registered and the effectiveness of governments will be guaranteed. Speaking of social stability, people will remind some important and emergent problems that should be firstly considered- Employment. This issue relates to people’s survival. Only when people’s daily foods and shelters in out of question will they feel happy and satisfied. These derive from jobs. Unemployment will downgrade the quality of their lives and then complain about government’s ignorance, sequencing the situation where society will be rebelled by these unemployed. For example, President Obama took office, he creates numerous occupations including automobile, IT industry. In addition, some spouses of veterans could be arranged jobs with acceptable salaries. His efforts of making more jobs all over the countries has given his credits with higher approval rates and stimulate the whole society into no much chaos and rebellion.
Secondly, government should bear the obligation of solving the issue on how to solve air pollution. This problem directly impacts people’s health. When haze or smog always permeates in air, people will inhale unclean air and cause infection of lung, which would trigger more labors to take leaves for disease and jeopardize competitiveness and strength of a whole nation. It can be explained by taking a brutally vivid example of Chinese smog. Sadly, Chinese people, especially in Northern part of China, are experiencing the most severe haze since before. The reason behind it is that government’s priority embeds in upsurge of economic development at any cost of pollution and survival of people and animals. Although the progress of economy is significant, it could be renewable and sustainable without considering environment. More data shows that at autumn and spring, more children and adults catch colds because of dirty air which more readily reduce resistance ability over virus. Some must take leaves from workplaces and schools. This issue, although it does not matter in short term, would be stretched into insidious threats of physical unhealthiness all over the countries, at that time, it will threat the economic development because more people become ill.
Talking about the future issue, people cannot help to contemplate aging problem. Although it does not temporarily influence society and people’s life, in the panoramic view it would possibly stagnate economic progress, which cause a nation lax behind most countries in the globe. For example, Japan is the country with the most serious aging tendency. The Japanese government enacted efficacious laws to alleviate this problem including rewarding parents who volunteered to more births with 10,000 dollars and optimizing systems of pediatrics with more inputs of professional pediatricians. Communities facilitate with social workers to help children step in schools. All these efforts were fruited with more families who dare to be pregnant with generously financial support by governments. Because the Japanese government realized the consequence of ignoring this issue, their immediate emphasis can effectively suspend lack of labors and surplus of senior citizens. Higher fertility means more labors and less expenditure of raising senior citizens from the treasury of governments.
To conclude it, all governments in the globe should pay attention to urgent and immediate issues in the first place, however, they still should not overlook the potential issue which society should have.
- If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting yo 16
- If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting yo 70
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 83
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 75
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field. 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1059, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...es and stimulate the whole society into no much chaos and rebellion. Secondly, go...
^^
Line 8, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ential issue which society should have.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example, in addition, in short, speaking of, talking about, to begin with, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 87.0 58.6224719101 148% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3472.0 2235.4752809 155% => OK
No of words: 614.0 442.535393258 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65472312704 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.977853291 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94281422204 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 337.0 215.323595506 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548859934853 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 1062.0 704.065955056 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.2370786517 163% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.3744209668 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.212121212 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6060606061 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21212121212 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164312589942 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431097595788 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431271677772 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107740321675 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299834159982 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.1639044944 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 194.0 100.480337079 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.